Subject:
|
Re: The Sun is not being very nice.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:38:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
231 times
|
| |
 | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > According to the following Guardian story, anyway:
> >
> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,919003,00.html
> >
> > Wonder if it's true? Wonder if The Sun will get fined...
> >
> > I guess I can see where they're coming from given this statement by Chirac
> > today: ""France would not accept a resolution which authorizes military
> > intervention and gives the United States and Britain administrative powers
> > in Iraq," Chirac said. "
> >
> > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20030321/wl_nm/iraq_france_chirac_dc_2
> >
> > But still, it's not very nice for The Sun to say that.
>
> But I'm glad they did; it helps me to believe that there indeed might be hope
> for France after all.
>
> JOHN
What do you think about Canada, John? I mean, because France may have
ulterior motives to speak against this war(their own oil interests in Iraq),
what about the other countries that are speaking up against this fiasco your
own United States caused?
If it was one dissenting voice, that we could write off--but it's not just
France, John--it's many many people, many many voices--and even in your
little 'coalition of the willing' the people of these countries are
protesting--loudly.
Dave K
-who believes that there may, indeed, be hope for the United States after all
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:     
    
   
     
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|