To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15801
15800  |  15802
Subject: 
Re: New Stories from the New Testament
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:19:47 GMT
Viewed: 
1708 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
> John wrote:
> > 
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ben Roller writes:
> > 
> > > Lighten up and get back to building. :)
> > > Ben Roller
> > 
> > Herein perhaps lies part of the problem IMO.  BPS has taken a subject that is
> > for many a serious one, and while folks with a good sense of humor can brush it
> > off, some might find it offensive.
> 
> Well, you can probably always find someone to find something offensive.
> 
> > For instance, I personally find those holocaust sets to be offensive
> > trivializations rather than "art".  Certainly BPS's work is frivolous, and IMO
> > most certainly appeals to non Christians rather than Christians.
> > 
> > For non Christians, it seems to me that it is some sort of vindication that the
> > Bible and its stories are bogus, or at least not serious.
> > 
> > To a Christian, there seems to be a underlying mocking tone (at least to this
> > one).
> 
> I haven't looked at these in too much detail, but what I see is someone
> combining two life passions. Is it wrong for people to look for ways to
> express things which are important to them?

I never questioned whether it was right or wrong, but rather its appropriateness
(if that's a word).  As Ian Malcolm once stated: "Just because you can do
something doesn't mean you should..."

Is the _ONLY_ way to express
> the content of the Bible the Bible itself? In which case, should
> Christians be like Moslems and declare that only an original Bible, not
> a translation, is valid? Which language then?
> 
> I hope you don't have any paintings of Bible scenes, after all, they're
> just someone's interpretation. Or will you claim that a painting somehow
> is more respectful? Why?

That's an interesting point.  Look at the depictions of Jesus throughout the
centuries.  A lot of times he's a blond-haired European type.  To me, bible art
says more about the artist and what he/she believes than about the subject
itself...

But to answer your hope: I have no religious artwork. :-)

-John
> 
> Frank



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New Stories from the New Testament
 
(...) Well, you can probably always find someone to find something offensive. (...) I haven't looked at these in too much detail, but what I see is someone combining two life passions. Is it wrong for people to look for ways to express things which (...) (25 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

47 Messages in This Thread:




















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR