To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15713
15712  |  15714
Subject: 
Re: left-leaning pantywaists in Britain (Re: So are they prisoners of war or what?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 4 Feb 2002 17:15:51 GMT
Viewed: 
355 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

It's my understanding that Walker

is alleged to have

  Oops.  Fair enough.

committed by the other detainees.  Since Walker is a citizen, for
instance, he is able to commit treason against the US, but the average
Al-Qaida member is not similarly able.  Therefore, Walker can be arrested
for treason and therefore tried in the US, while non-US citizens cannot be
so arrested.  Further, as a US citizein, Walker's crime is also an offense
separate from that of the other detainees; the detainees engaged in war
against the US, while Walker engaged in treason.

Indeed. But there are UK "detainees" in Cuba too. Could these guys not have
committed treason against the UK? Could they not go on trial in the UK with
real charges against them?

  Maybe--has the UK made any effort to extradite those detainees (who have,
I understand, reported that conditions in the detainment center are
perfectly adequate)?   That's a good question, though.  What's the UK's
policy on it?

One does not need to be an expert on "international wartime legalese" to
know that the conditions these *alleged* terrorists are being kept in does
not meet the standards one would normally expect.

  The conditions of their incarceration in fact greatly exceed what I "would
normally expect" to be maintained for American prisoners held by foreign
powers, so what "one would normally expect" seems mostly irrelevant to me.
In fact, the conditions in which they are being held are superior to the
conditions in which I lived during my first two years of college!  What's so
awful about their conditions, exactly?

From AI:

  Out of curiosity, are there any examples of AI getting similarly
up-in-arms about the treatment of US citizens in unlawful foreign
detainment?  I ask this in sincere good faith.

Denying prisoners their internationally recognised rights -- including the
right to a fair trial -- can constitute a war crime under the Geneva
Conventions and other international humanitarian law.

  Also in good faith:  does international law set a timeframe for such a trial?

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: left-leaning pantywaists in Britain (Re: So are they prisoners of war or what?)
 
(...) It was claimed that they were "happy" - which I thought odd. (...) Concerned, but non-troubling making is how I’d describe it: Straw to quiz US on UK captives (URL) (...) That is irrelevant (even if true). But I do wonder how the next US POW's (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: left-leaning pantywaists in Britain (Re: So are they prisoners of war or what?)
 
(...) is alleged to have (...) alleged to have been (...) Indeed. But there are UK "detainees" in Cuba too. Could these guys not have committed treason against the UK? Could they not go on trial in the UK with real charges against them? (...) One (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

18 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR