Subject:
|
Re: So are they prisoners of war or what?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:46:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
254 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lawrence Wilkes writes:
> Given the amount of debate here following Sept 11th, I am surprised this hasn't come up in this forum before.
>
> Are the al-Qaida suspects detained at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base being treated fairly?
Probably. I suspect you mean, "are they being treated legally?", to which I
would answer, probably not.
>
> And if the US is at war with terrorists, are they prisoners of war?
Interesting gray area. In the conventional sense, I would think not - but
they would then have the rights of any accused criminal held by the U.S.,
which I think would work out to be even more protective. Further, they are
being held on a military base, which would indicate to me that they *are*
prisoners of war. I also think the authorities want to try them under
miliary law, which would also imply prisoner of war.
I think the U.S. wants to have its cake and eat it, too (get the best of two
worlds without any drawbacks of choosing either course).
Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | So are they prisoners of war or what?
|
| Given the amount of debate here following Sept 11th, I am surprised this hasn't come up in this forum before. Are the al-Qaida suspects detained at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base being treated fairly? And if the US is at war with terrorists, are they (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
