 | | At last, a Federal program we can all support. —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (URL) Ms. Targ has received $243,228.00 from the NIH to fund her bogus study, representing the first installment on what is likely to "amount to more than 2 million dollars of federal funds over the next few years." This quote is pulled from (URL) (...) (23 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: At last, a Federal program we can all support. —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | Dave Schuler brings our attention to: (...) -> 1. Five years experience as a healer (meaning that -> close to half of their professional time has been -> spent providing energy healing, spiritual healing, -> prayer, or shamanic healing to (...) (23 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: At last, a Federal program we can all support. —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) It's like those shows on the Discovery Channel that quote "UFO experts" or "experts in the paranormal." How the heck does someone qualify as a UFO expert? Has he "seen" a bunch of UFOs? Has he heard a lot of stories about UFOs? Did he see (...) (23 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Doing the Discover Mag Rag (Was: At last, a Federal program we can all support.) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | (...) (Not that Discover magazine really has anything to do with Discovery Communications Inc., but still...) So here's a little story. I'm in the position where, to compliment my National Geographic collection, I'm looking for a subscription to any (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag (Was: At last, a Federal program we can all support.) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I would favor Scientific American but that's just because I've never read the other two. I find SA to be a very absorbing read. But it's not a read while watching TV sort of rag, you need to give it your full attention to get what the articles (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag (Was: At last, a Federal program we can all support.) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) We get New Scientist, it tends to be a bit "current" but it is a good read. The range of articles in it means one can spend and afternoon with it, or just a cup of coffee. It does not have the depth of Scientific American, but the detail is (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag (Was: At last, a Federal program we can all support.) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) That last chunk in the back of nothing but British job ads is a dangerous thing to have in the house, especially since Barbara wants to move us to England. :-, Indeed, this is an ongoing discussion in our house. Reasons to move to England: - (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag (Was: At last, a Federal program we can all support.) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) Yes, it certainly brings new meaning to the phrase "have an Indian". I admit of a double take the first time I heard that phrase used to mean going out for food (not that I've heard it any other way, mind you) However according to the Red (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag (Was: At last, a Federal program we can all support.) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) Is this because of the curry-houses? I thought it was due to BSE? ;) The 3 month limit is crazy, one bad burger[1] is all it takes to catch it. Scott A [1] Or other beef product. (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag (Was: At last, a Federal program we can all support.) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) 1. It's not Scotland. (...) What is "thingy"? (...) In Scotland it's pretty much the same, except we boil everything in lard - not water. ;-) Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Cheap Scientist (Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag ) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | After out recent new scientist "debate", I got this e-mail from them today: ==+== New Scientist - it's essential reading for anyone with a passion for exploration and discovery. Subscribe today and save 60% off the annual price of USD 140 - that's 1 (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Cheap Scientist (Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag ) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | | | That is cheap. Hmm... buy it or use the library copy.... decisions decisions (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Cheap Scientist (Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag ) —Dave Low
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Buy it buy it! Each week a fresh issue delivered to your mailbox, to (cherish/ tear articles out of/ swat bugs with) for only a buck a pop -- what a bargain! Thanks for the ref Scott. // Dave (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Cheap Scientist (Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag ) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | | | (...) As I was going through my inbox right after I posted about this I found the same message Scott posted. I should read all my mail when it arrives. Thanks Scott -chris (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag (Was: At last, a Federal program we can all support.) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, the guy who said 3 generations didn't really specify what his critera were. To get a self-sustaining market economy could take just a few years. To get their economy, middle class, and standard of living up to expectations set by their (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag (Was: At last, a Federal program we can all support.) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Well, if you're only looking to maintain the status quo of scientific integrity, Weekly World News isn't too much of a leap away from Discover! I don't follow many science journals too regularly, though I'll pick up an occasional Scientific (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag (Was: At last, a Federal program we can all support.) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | (...) Don't be so quick to dismiss the Weekly World News! I find it an invaluable resource for the all-too-often times I'm stuck behind someone who's trying to buy 18 cases of soup at the grocery store. And besides, I can't wait to see how the Bat (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Doing the Discover Mag Rag (Was: At last, a Federal program we can all support.) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Science News. It's thin. It's weekly. It summarizes the findings from all the real journals with enough reference that you can go get the whole article if you want to. And you can always pick up the especially interesting Scientific American (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
