Debate : 13917


Off-Topic / Debate / 13917	13916 \| 13918

Subject:	Re: Cuba is a terrorist state (was Re: Any truth in this one - Cuba as a terrostist state.
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Sun, 14 Oct 2001 15:06:31 GMT
Viewed:	264 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lawrence Wilkes writes: > Or perhaps you could also ask the question how many sympathisers to > thier cause do you need in the US government? > Or how many votes might be lost if they are on the list? Those were posed as rhetorical questions I assume, but they are nevertheless valid and I admit of no answer.

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Cuba is a terrorist state (was Re: Any truth in this one - Cuba as a terrostist state.
(...) The corollary of Lawrence's question, of course, is: "how many votes might be lost if they aren't on the list?" I noticed the very small amount of text re: Cuba, and none that implies a state sponsorship--it appears to be more a matter of (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Cuba is a terrorist state (was Re: Any truth in this one - Cuba as a terrostist state.
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GL6rMI.4nw@lugnet.com... (...) Or perhaps you could also ask the question how many sympathisers to thier cause do you need in the US government? Or how many votes might be lost if (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

14 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search