Subject:
|
Re: Children and Violence
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Oct 2001 19:38:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
171 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John J. Ladasky, Jr. writes:
>
> > Why we still haven't obtained a definite answer to this question, with the
> > benefit of a century of reasonably scentific psychology, is a mystery to me.
>
> Nothing (short of raising a number of kids in Skinner boxes) can
> *experimentally* answer this, would be my suspicion. Otherwise too many
> factors muddy whether it's a cause or not...
If there is a causal relationship that is strong enough to be worried about,
then surely it is something that an attempt at correlation would find. Since
such correlation hasn't been shown, I think that we can temporarily behave
like there is no correlation.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Children and Violence
|
| (...) Nothing (short of raising a number of kids in Skinner boxes) can *experimentally* answer this, would be my suspicion. Otherwise too many factors muddy whether it's a cause or not... (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
