Subject:
|
Re: The *militia* saved flight 93 from a worse fate...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Sep 2001 19:55:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
258 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Horst Lehner writes:
> Hello Chris,
>
> > One might wonder how much less destruction there would have been on 11
> > September if some or many of the passengers had been armed.
>
> Given the fact that even in the Sep. 11 disaster, less people were probably
> killed than are killed in a "normal" year by use of guns in the US, I tend
> to prefer NOT to legalize taking firearms into planes.
In 1999, there were 8,718 firearm related homocides in the US. So you're
probably right. But the broad-picture statistics suggest that as the
concealed-carry rate increases, the violent crime rate decreases. So I'd claim
that that high number was in part caused by our firearm prohibitions. Further,
whether or not this recent disaster compares to a normal year (I'm not seeing
what conclusions you can draw from that), it would be highly valuable (at least
to me) to have prevented the 6000+ deaths that resulted from this recent
terrorism.
> Maybe a few armed policemen, conservatively clothed, but certainly not the
> larger public ...
I'm not entirely opposed to sky marshals, but I'd rather the airlines supply
the guards. That way each consumer could choose to pay or not pay for the
added security.
Chris
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|