To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13043
13042  |  13044
Subject: 
Re: The *militia* saved flight 93 from a worse fate...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 21 Sep 2001 19:55:03 GMT
Viewed: 
232 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Horst Lehner writes:
Hello Chris,

One might wonder how much less destruction there would have been on 11
September if some or many of the passengers had been armed.

Given the fact that even in the Sep. 11 disaster, less people were probably
killed than are killed in a "normal" year by use of guns in the US, I tend
to prefer NOT to legalize taking firearms into planes.

In 1999, there were 8,718 firearm related homocides in the US.  So you're
probably right.  But the broad-picture statistics suggest that as the
concealed-carry rate increases, the violent crime rate decreases.  So I'd claim
that that high number was in part caused by our firearm prohibitions.  Further,
whether or not this recent disaster compares to a normal year (I'm not seeing
what conclusions you can draw from that), it would be highly valuable (at least
to me) to have prevented the 6000+ deaths that resulted from this recent
terrorism.

Maybe a few armed policemen, conservatively clothed, but certainly not the
larger public ...

I'm not entirely opposed to sky marshals, but I'd rather the airlines supply
the guards.  That way each consumer could choose to pay or not pay for the
added security.

Chris



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: The *militia* saved flight 93 from a worse fate...
 
(...) Speaking of which, I'm not too keen on what I seem to be hearing about the airline bailout bill. Some background... The exact story of why it is that the airlines are in charge of gate security and sort of *not* in charge as well is very (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: The *militia* saved flight 93 from a worse fate...
 
(...) But the effects of that decision outweigh the need for the individual to preserve that decision-making right, unless only the individual is going to be affected by the decision. That is, if a plane is to be hijacked and used to kill several (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: The *militia* saved flight 93 from a worse fate...
 
Hello Chris, (...) Well, I don't want to dive into a firearms discussion here. What I wanted to oppose is the idea that air travel is safer when firearms are allowed to be taken into planes by passengers. (...) And how can people working in (...) (23 years ago, 22-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The *militia* saved flight 93 from a worse fate...
 
Hello Chris, (...) Given the fact that even in the Sep. 11 disaster, less people were probably killed than are killed in a "normal" year by use of guns in the US, I tend to prefer NOT to legalize taking firearms into planes. Maybe a few armed (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

26 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR