To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 12385
12384  |  12386
Subject: 
Re: Views on asylum seekers?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:00:21 GMT
Viewed: 
378 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:

[big snip, I agree]

I was just thinking (ooh, dangerous) a bit... A while ago I proposed
that the conditions in the "third world" are partially the fault of the
populations of those countries. I'd like to revise that thought a bit
and point out that if we did have open immigration, many more of those
petty dictatorships would collapse. Why? Because the populace would have
more opportunity to vote with their feet.

Agreed.  Further, what would happen if by offering a place to the people of
Banana Republic X, we got more than half of them to want to come to the US?
Could we charge them the nation that they're leaving as a fee?  We could then
just go occupy their territory since a majority of them voted for it.  It's a
new land-grab scam!

But actually, I think that we should offer whole smallish populations the
opportunity to be replaced into the US.  We're large enough to take them in and
we could send "normal" Americans out to where the new immigrants used to live,
to colonize the new frontier.

We should do that with Jerusalem too.  Make it a territory of the US, establish
US justice, move the problem people out, and happy North Americans in.  Then we
could let neighboring nationals visit their Holy sites all they wanted, and it
wouldn't be in the hands of their religious antithesis.  I wonder if I could
get the concessions contract?

Why not crosspost this to .fun?

Pedro



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Views on asylum seekers?
 
(...) Heck, why not a new newsgroup, lugnet.off-topic.sar...drip.drip? ;) I still disagree, by the way, that people in third world countries are any more responsible for their personal lot than we're each responsible for the prosperity brought by (...) (23 years ago, 4-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Views on asylum seekers?
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes: [big snip, I agree] (...) Agreed. Further, what would happen if by offering a place to the people of Banana Republic X, we got more than half of them to want to come to the US? Could we charge them the (...) (23 years ago, 3-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

19 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR