To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 12401
12400  |  12402
Subject: 
Re: Views on asylum seekers?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 5 Sep 2001 06:23:43 GMT
Viewed: 
1462 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> > I'm sure the building industry would be delighted to find room and resources
> > to accomodate new Australians. As for the cost, how about a $14000 new home
> > buyers grant? Seriously, the government is spending a massive amount of
> > money on refugee detention already. A couple of instantly researched cites:
> > ~$170/person/day
> > http://www.immi.gov.au/annual_report/annrep97/html/prog8002.htm
> > (government's own figures, a little out of date)
> > ~$10000/person
> > http://www.erc.org.au/issues/text/as01.htm
> > (quoting Ruddock, Minister for Immigration -- this site also presents some
> > facts the government never manages to mention)
> 
> I think we're getting confused between asylum seekers, and refugees here. See
> below.

Whichever, the argument against detention remains the same I think. The
sustainable development question of population carrying
capacity/infrastructure/immigration levels is separate, but certainly related.

> > big ol' snip
> > They shouldn't -- I agree. But once someone arrives, and is assessed as
> > being a genuine refugee (which is no easy criterion to satisfy) what would
> > you do with them?
> 
> Welcome them into Australian society with open arms! However when they land on
> our coast they have to stay somewhere while the government makes that
> assessment. Currently, that's usually a detention camp. But whereever it is,
> they're forcing our government to pay for their accomodation during that
> period, taking money which could be used to pay housing grants for others
> who've applied before they got here. And if they're not assessed as genuine
> refugees, the government also carries the cost of deportation.

Here's another perspective, from slate:
http://slate.msn.com/foreigners/entries/01-09-04_114710.asp

--DaveL



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Views on asylum seekers?
 
(...) I (...) I think we're getting confused between asylum seekers, and refugees here. See below. (...) I don't have anything to back this up except some snippets I've read in newspapers (and we all know how reliable they are), but I think most of (...) (25 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

19 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR