Subject:
|
Re: someone has to say it...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Jul 2001 04:59:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
162 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
[snip]
> And somewhere between these extremes is the place where we're content as
> emplyees. Somewhere where we feel that companies are being fair enough and
> charitable enough, without overstepping the boundaries of each. And of
> course the actual question Shiri proposed was is giving time off for PMS
> symptoms too unjust? Or is *not* allowing time off too uncharitable? Is
> there a happy medium between the two wherein a balanced policy can exist?
> Personally, I think it's only possible in theory-- in practice such a policy
> would become abused and ducked behind.
Like so many other political & corporate policies....
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: someone has to say it...
|
| (...) Potentially being one of the subjects of this post (?) I'd like to make a distinction here-- I think the first time I was forced to realize it was reading Emanuel Levinas-- the distinction between the morals of charity and justice. Justice is (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
