To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10166
10165  |  10167
Subject: 
Re: Ok, why such anti-American sentiment? (Was Re: the metric system)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 2 May 2001 19:25:58 GMT
Viewed: 
351 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

It seems that your Pacific front was a matter of self-
defense, but what of your European front?  Again, what of Vietnam?  Did an
Australian Red Scare lead to fear of an expanding Asian communist empire?  Did
Australia's national interests play a part in conflicts even when your territory
was not immediately endangered?

Australia? Why was America their!

America should not have invaded Vietnam.  My question involving Australia's
involvement in Vietnam was rhetorical.  My point was that America isn't the only
nation to have gone to war in modern times for reasons that are not for clear-
cut issues of moral sensibility, and that i find it unfair (and this comment
isn't directed toward David Low) when American sacrifices - sacrifices that were
to the benefit of not only our ourselves, but a great deal of humanity - are
casually dismissed because the motives were not entirely self-affacing.  Would
Europe come to our aid if we were being despoiled by a tyrant?  Would Europe
send its soldiers to die in defense of America on our ground without a moment's
hesitation?  (Yes, America hestitated, but is Europe of stronger moral fiber?)
Would Europe, in fact, defend our soil that it would remain free ground?  I hope
so, but I'm not confident that anything but token aid would be forthcoming if
push really came to shove and we were fighting for our lives on our continent.
Is America the only nation that has its own national interests to protect?  Is
it in the national interests (be they economic, political, or whatever) of any
nation that the North American continent remain a stable place?  Probably.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Ok, why such anti-American sentiment? (Was Re: the metric system)
 
(...) The only case I can think of that might address this question is the US Civil War. Europe walked an amazing tightrope then, in part to avoid upsetting the balance of Europe internally-- although Britain recognised "belligerent rights" with (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ok, why such anti-American sentiment? (Was Re: the metric system)
 
(...) From distant memories of my School boy History. There was. Japan actually bombed the North of Oz a few times (Darwin?). The Oz Government had a plan only to defend an internal triangle which I think was almost Melbourne - Brisbain - Cairns. I (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

30 Messages in This Thread:













Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR