To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *9491 (-20)
  Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
 
Whoa! hold on there, Tex! "I'd rather be understanding than right" -me fact: everybody in here is just trying to communicate there thoughts and feelings and to get feedback on others thoughts and feelings fact: ascii is easily misinterpreted fact: (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
 
(...) Mark is far from the only person who thinks your response was both arrogant and rude. eric (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
 
(...) I don't know why you wouldn't be flattered. Eric said "your work is pretty good TOO" (emphasis mine), which is putting your stuff on the same level as the models you were raving about. I would certainly take this as a compliment. Please either (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
 
(...) No doubt. Mladen has turned out some great models. It's his sheer arrogance that bugs the crap out of me. If I could just killfile his posts and instead check his website periodically, that would be best. I'm sure others say the same of me (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
 
(...) When was I being rude? I even typed "sarcasm ON/OFF" when I posted my reply to indicate that I was making a point! I never stomped Eric. If you want my opinion, I think his models are excellent, and some of the most awe-inspiring I have ever (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
 
(...) I understand that Mladen may not have felt totally flattered by Eric's comment, but I sincerely believe that Eric _intended_ it as a compliment. I was just calling Mladen on his rudeness, because I don't think Eric deserved to be stomped on. I (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
 
(...) I have to agree with Sproat here...I've lost respect. Mladen - your attitude came off sounding like you felt you deserved more praise, and his compliment wasn't enough for your models. It appears to me, at least, that you have an over-inflated (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
 
(...) Hey, I respect Mladen! His stuff IS great, as is Eric Sophie's work. I'm wondering though if you pull up to a full service attitude pump and pump your own attitude, effectively making it self-service, do you have to pay the full service price? (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
 
(...) gut-level reaction. When I read your comment yesterday, it sounded to me like a "looking down on someone" kind of comment. I figured I musta been mistaking your meaning, but it seemed to stand out. I'd seen similar sorts of confusions in the (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
 
(...) Wait. The former governor of Texas loves oil companies? Well, that's a huge shock. eric (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
 
(...) Mladen, you are a braggart and a serious jerk. I think I speak for most everyone here when I tell you that you have just lost the valuable respect of many. It would be best if you left your whiny, self-serving attitude at home. Cheers, - (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build.mecha)
 
  Re: WOW ~ #1593 Classic Space ~ WOW!!!...!!!
 
(...) Ok - your point? I did that. And yes, I saw the other thread - so what? Can I not start a new thread? Did I offend you, or anybody by starting a new thread? I really doubt it - so does it matter? Why did you feel you had to post this? Like I (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.auction)
 
  Re: Kunimasa Fujisawa's AMAZING mecha!
 
(...) around and insult the person trying to pay you a compliment. Like the time someone told you you'd improved and you went off on them. (I just don't even feel like looking it up) Just exactly where do you get off anyway? ~Grand Admiral Muffin (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Who does W. Love? BIG OIL!!!
 
It Begins. (URL) a guy. ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: NOT the Queen's English ('Muricans)
 
(...) Oh quit cracking jokes. ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
 
  Re: NOT the Queen's English ('Muricans)
 
(...) Okay, there. Pared down. Happy? :-) (...) That depends: engineers can't spell, scientists are better about it. (...) You can call me Al, but you don't need to call me Aluminium? (...) Nothing to make it a long U. The root word is Al-um, not (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: NOT the Queen's English (was re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
 
My God, header frenzy!: (...) Sure, those Cal Tech boys can rig up an RF unit to screw with the Rose Bowl scoreboard, but can they really spell...? It's like asking someone with a doctorate in pediatrics (paediatrics for the ANZAC/UK crowd) to take (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Grammar vs Logic (was: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenienttoday)
 
(...) "Write" like a lot of other words has several meanings. I've always understood those shorthandings (of which there are soooo many in Dutch that I can't possibly follow any but the most rudimentary conversations even after eight months) have (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Acronyms (Was Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
 
(...) Oops, I should clarify that Rolls Royce is both the singular and the plural form. Maggie C. (who has once again sacrificed clarity for the sake of brevity) Oh yes, and I shall henceforth use AFOL as the plural of AFOL since your argument that (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 
  Re: Acronyms (Was Re: Lugnet Guide a lot less convenient today)
 
(...) Not a "real" word, but a word nonetheless, as opposed to a string of distinct letters. AFOL, if pronounced as a word ("I'm an AFOL") rather than spelled out ("I'm an A-F-O-L"), is an acronym by that definition. The convention was to say "WAC" (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR