To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *5176 (-20)
  Re: Perspective (Was:Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!))
 
(...) Please don't feel sorry for me - *I* am perfectly capable of making myself understood without resorting to certain words. Also, please understand that my disappointment is not in the words used (fairly trivial for everyday conversation), but (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Insider Trading (Was: Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!))
 
(...) I admittedly know very little about stock market stuff, so this is mean in the spirit of innocence - my flame proof suit is at the dry-cleaners.. I've just become curious about this "insider trading" law thingy - has the market ever operated (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) ! 
 
  Re: Ad hominem attacks
 
(...) Can't (...) Oh alright. You can probably find some politicians untainted by the process somewhere. You were supposed to laugh, not argue! :-) Again I'd point to the LP track record (if I just could dig it (...) And you'll kindly notice that I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Ad hominem attacks
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: Liberal, conservative, democrat, republican: They are all politicians. Can't (...) Hmm... *L*ibertarian *P*arty... *L*arry *P*ieniazek... Interesting... 8^) Dave! (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Wench as a word
 
(...) You are correct, sir! ++Lar (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Wench as a word
 
(...) I believe Larry was using sarcasm to illustrate that very point. Bill (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: Wench as a word
 
(...) right? (...) I know about the unrest between Korean storeowners and African-Americans. What I was trying to get at is that if one uses slang like "whitey" and states that only whites can be racist (not true) then one does need some sensitvity (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Wench as a word
 
Gloria, (...) I think what Larry was saying here is when Al Sharpton called lynching on a Korean run grocery store in New York. I don't think anyone here is advocating lynching anyone, except for the types like Al Sharpton and perhaps James (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: Wench as a word
 
(...) Not true, even *in* academia. Certainly not among any of the African Studies people I know, and I'm in just such a supposed "bastion of orthodoxy." The people who deny racism can exist among minorities make an easy foil, but they're far rarer (...) (25 years ago, 26-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: Why the Net doesn't belong to America
 
(...) Sure. Executive summary: The author's all wet. Ignore him. More: Libertarian viewpoint (and the author clearly is trying to use Libertarian as a denigrating comment, too bad for him he doesn't get it) or not, the net as a whole doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate) ! 
 
  Re: Wench as a word
 
(...) Sel (...) part (...) Not true even among liberal thinkers. Anyone of any race can be racist. He/She only has to believe one race to be superior to the others. (...) racism, (...) deserve (...) word (...) I think you all are hoping there are no (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Why the Net doesn't belong to America
 
(URL) care to comment on this? (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Is Heaven recursive? and other perplexing questions
 
(...) I think you left a smiley out. I've never killed anyone, you know. Except perhaps bored them to death... (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: Gay Marriages/Domestic Partnerships and the IRS
 
Well, Ed posted a good question and we've heard from a pretty wide spectrum of viewpoints. Self selected, more geeky than the population as a whole (as well as nicer, cooler, and generally better looking, but I digress) I'd sum up everyone by saying (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: Ad hominem attacks
 
(...) Disagree. Again I'd point to the LP track record (if I just could dig it up in 90 secs, it's out there somewhere) in the limited situations where we have had elected officials, we've hewn to our word and done what we could do to dismantle the (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: Wench as a word
 
(...) Outside of academia. See, most of the people you and I know are fairly reasonable, fairly rational (not perfect, mind you)... we both presumably know mostly normal mainstream people. But in the bastions of orthodoxy where this stuff emanates, (...) (25 years ago, 25-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: Gay Marriages/Domestic Partnerships and the IRS
 
(...) I'm not sure it should. I know that my church wass lobbying for the anti-gay marriage measure in California, and I'm not sure it was the best thing to do. In this country, a church should have the right to tell its members what they should and (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: Is Heaven recursive? and other perplexing questions
 
(...) Sounds kinda circular. Where is it said that no one made God? The Alpha and Omega (beginning and end) statement might've been directed towards us mortals; He created and will destroy each and every one of us, as we understand our current (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Is Heaven recursive? and other perplexing questions
 
(...) Isn't reading Slashdot before trying to sleep kinda like watching _Titanic_ before going on a cruise? ;-) (...) Todd, are you sure you're not a Mormon? :-O :-, You're touching upon some very basic beliefs from my church. (...) Pardonez-moi (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Purimish fun
 
(...) Depends on what you mean by 'devil'. Do you mean the guy in a red suit with horns and a pointy tail, carrying a trident? Yeah, that probably is non- Jewish. Non-Christian, too, although it's a bit of mythology made up *by* Christians (I (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR