 | | To No One's Big Surprise...
|
|
I'm a social libertarian... (URL) thought you'd like to know... Dave K (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) I guess you didn't bother to watch the video. Dick himself used the Q-word to describe the aftermath of a unilateral invasion of Iraq. But that was before he used it to mock people who said operation Blood For Oil was a Bad Idea. (...) Four (...) (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) Ah! I get it: Not that numbers mean anything. Cheers Richie Dulin (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) Prettier than you, at least. (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) What a thing to say! (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) And yet it's not really an answer, is it? (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) I guess you answered your own question. ROSCO (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) Do you have a cite for that? ROSCO (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) "This is precisely the mindset and rationale the terrorists would like their enemies to have. " Seems pretty unequivocal to me. (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) Okay, I'll type slowly so you can follow along. (...) It shows that the enemy is afraid to engage the US military. The cowards decide to fight a war of propaganda targeting innocents instead. And really, do they think that the Iraqis will (...) (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) Not one death is "acceptable" (YOUR word, not mine). (...) Yes. What I mean is: if 10 innocents are killed today, and 12 tomorrow, then that doesn't mean we are suddenly "losing". And if there are only 2 the following day, we are not suddenly (...) (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) Averages are seldom a good measure of populations. Mind you, as the declining population approaches 1, they get a lot better. Cheers Richie Dulin (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) Hmmm, I have to admit I'm a little confused here. The death of innocents shows the US is winning, but actually keeping count of those deaths is what those terrorists want. Could you clarify something for me: is the death of innocents a good or (...) (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) So you'd consider ANY body count "acceptable" in order to "win" this military action? And do you think the average Iraqi would have the same answer to that question as you do? ROSCO (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) We are winning because we are taking control of areas that once weren't under control. Little by little the terrorists are being squeezed out. Winning or losing isn't based on the daily body count. This is precisely the mindset and rationale (...) (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) So the more the US wins, the more innocents die? Cheers Richie Dulin (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) Ahh, thanks for dusting off and bringing the Q word into the discussion! If you think that any of the homicide bombers over the years would have reconsidered their actions because there had been broad support for the invasion of Iraq, you are (...) (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) The difference is that Cheney's prediction in 1994 was *exactly* correct. Current events clearly show that invading Iraq without broad support from our allies resulted in a quagmire. Are you saying that in 2003 Cheney was so certain of his (...) (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
Yes, but what in the WORLD changed Cheney's mind? To date, there really hasn't been any evidence whatsoever that has surfaced that would explain his about-face on the issue. (and before you tell me "we don't know all the facts", (...) (17 years ago, 16-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
(...) I confess that in 1901 I said to my brother Orville that man would not fly for fifty years. Two years later we ourselves made flights. This demonstration of my impotence as a prophet gave me such a shock that ever since I have distrusted (...) (17 years ago, 16-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
|
This guy sounds like he really knows what he's talking about. Too bad he doesn't have any influence over U.S. foreign policy today... (URL) (17 years ago, 16-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Credit where it's due (was Re: Fan Thank You Letter)
|
|
(...) In the past few days I've been in a discussion on another forum wherein people have referred disparagingly to Ms. Liebeck's lawsuit. I recalled this thread from a few years back here on LUGNET and was able to use your link to shut down most of (...) (17 years ago, 13-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
(...) "Let the eagle soar, like he's never soared before." (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
|
|
(...) And who would have thought that the very next Attorney General would be so much worse than either of them? Dave! (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
|
|
(...) Vegetable? Mineral? ;-) Tim (17 years ago, 25-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT)
|
|
(...) I'm quitting my job now I know Harvey's on the job supporting everyone. Who do I send my bills to? The IRS, or directly to Harvey? Allister (17 years ago, 24-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickShelf and the bust.
|
|
(...) I guess it's different if it's an Ad ;) Tim (17 years ago, 24-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT)
|
|
Harvey wrote some stuff, including: (...) Good for you! (...) Like playing with little train horns? (...) Why would I want to silence you? Your posts are a source of great amusement to me, lol. (...) ROSCO (Wondering just how your taxes support me) (17 years ago, 24-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT)
|
|
(...) -snip- (...) And for that, we(1) will be forever grateful . Cheers Richie Dulin (1) I hope I'm not being too presumptious in speaking for the rest of the world here. (17 years ago, 23-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | (murfl)
|
|
(murfl) (17 years ago, 23-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A new community of mischeif and mayhem
|
|
(...) Because I don't know how to post and cross-post properly... (17 years ago, 23-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: A new community of mischeif and mayhem
|
|
(...) Woohoo! Sounds like a great place! (...) Yes, that seems to cover all the themes which are popular in the community. (...) Sounds like a bargain! (...) Cheers Richie Dulin Stajinaria Member #2 (Not sure why FUT is set to .o-t.d....) (17 years ago, 23-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | A new community of mischeif and mayhem
|
|
You know how when you go to look at the list of rules for a community forum, and the last one is something dumb like "The most important rule is to have fun"? Man, that irks me. Nobody has to tell me to have fun, it sorta comes naturally to me. And (...) (17 years ago, 22-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.announce, lugnet.people.adults) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Brickshelf?
|
|
Brickshelf is back up, with a warning date of the end of the month. Now's your chance, GO! (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) A bit off-topic here, but I'd hardly call Flickr a "bigbox". From their earliest days they have been a community oriented company in a way that nearly every other company around can learn from. They built a fantastic tool always keeping in (...) (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | BrickShelf and the bust.
|
|
Hello! I was just roaming the recent galleries on BrickShelf. Embedded inbetween the Lego folders was this advertisement: (URL) made me smirk. I remember a picture that concentrated on a female bust covered by a Lego t-shirt once caused uproar and (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
Big thanks to the defunct pseudo admins ! were you able to save my :BP: or :RA: ? Steve (17 years ago, 2-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) :whistlesinnocently: (URL) Stajinaria Forum - A New Hope> :-) (URL) (17 years ago, 29-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
Darn and bugger... Just as I was coming back after a short break. *sigh* and thanks to Ross and Janey you two can have my babies you were so awesome. (17 years ago, 29-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
|
|
(...) Ah,because you my friend know the sad state of affairs. (17 years ago, 28-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
