Subject:
|
Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Aug 2007 02:27:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6223 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
Winning or
losing isn’t based on the daily body count.
|
So you’d consider ANY body count “acceptable” in order to “win” this military
action? And do you think the average Iraqi would have the same answer to that
question as you do?
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
| (...) Not one death is "acceptable" (YOUR word, not mine). (...) Yes. What I mean is: if 10 innocents are killed today, and 12 tomorrow, then that doesn't mean we are suddenly "losing". And if there are only 2 the following day, we are not suddenly (...) (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: We Should've Listened to Dick Cheney
|
| (...) We are winning because we are taking control of areas that once weren't under control. Little by little the terrorists are being squeezed out. Winning or losing isn't based on the daily body count. This is precisely the mindset and rationale (...) (17 years ago, 17-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
