To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 53867
53866  |  53868
Subject: 
Re: Problems with Brickshelf?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:17:37 GMT
Viewed: 
11657 times
  
In lugnet.general, John Neal wrote:

   Yeah, that I’ll admit, but I never really looked for things past just browsing the recent pages. What I liked was the one-site shopping, and that it was an AFOL site, too. Flickr is bigbox. I like the corner drugstore guy;-)

A bit off-topic here, but I’d hardly call Flickr a “bigbox”. From their earliest days they have been a community oriented company in a way that nearly every other company around can learn from. They built a fantastic tool always keeping in mind community needs and actively community feedback.

They did so good at it, in fact, that they were acquired by Yahoo!. This has been a big help for them in dealing with precisely the same scaling/bandwidth issues that I assume are causing Kevin to turn off Brickshelf.

I understand and agree that supporting an AFOL-created site is a great thing to do. But the problem with that option is that once a community grows beyond a certain mass, you’re left with precisely the sort of situation we have here now.

I keep harping on the Flickr API and the specialized “Flickr Viewer” application (not something I could probably create personally) is that the likelihood of Yahoo! going away is drastically less than anything any one of the AFOLs could create specifically for the AFOL community. If we can find a smart solution(s) that helps give a Brickshelf-like user experience, while also creating something that we can reliably and safely assume will exist into the foreseeable future, it’s a win-win.

Even if Brickshelf were to return at the top of the hour, it’s always going to be at an ongoing risk for closure. Brickshelf (and really, any photo sharing site) is a victim of its own success. The more usage it gets, the business/financial risk grows exponentially. On top of that, any entirely free site should be considered a limited time activity. I’ve yet to think of a project on the Web that has been (mostly) ad/sponsor-free, subscription free, and major contributor-free, and still been around much longer than a few months.

Kevin has done an amazing thing for many, many years. But perhaps it’s time to really work on a solution that will comfortably last us all another 8 years (or more) and let Kevin retire with grace.

Jake
---
Jake McKee
Private Citizen
“Keeping hope alive”



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Problems with Brickshelf?
 
Brickshelf is back up, with a warning date of the end of the month. Now's your chance, GO! (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)  

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Problems with Brickshelf?
 
(...) But you are a wiz-kid, Jake, and I am but a simple, old-timer:-) (...) Yeah, that I'll admit, but I never really looked for things past just browsing the recent pages. What I liked was the one-site shopping, and that it was an AFOL site, too. (...) (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)

105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR