 | | Re: Thank you, Britain.
|
|
(...) I expect they think the Taliban will reject it. That is why this whole thing needs to move away from TV studios and go to the UN. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Thank you, Britain.
|
|
(...) Indeed, I can remember the problems the UK had extraditing terrorists from the USA... Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The big lie
|
|
(...) But a good deal of others are. Over the last few weeks there has been a lot of talk about how weak air security within the US compared the the rest of the "west". (...) Like I said, I just worry about corners being cut. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: War
|
|
(...) Come on Larry! Can you clear this one up? Scott A (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | gum arabic (was Re: War)
|
|
(...) Frank, Here is an easy one to fix. Try to read the whole text, look at the claimed impact that "mess" has had on the whole country: (URL) A (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another efficient way...
|
|
(...) Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The big lie
|
|
(...) Come on Larry, I really am interested in what you think freedom & liberty means, both within the context of the text I quoted and your fondness for the thoughts of George Roberson. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: War
|
|
(...) Dave, Have you thought this over yet? Scott A (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another efficient way...
|
|
(...) And I wonder if Charlton Heston owns one yet? (the preceding is meant as a purely good-natured jab, rather that a veiled gun control diatribe!) Dave! (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Thank you, Mr Blair.
|
|
(...) Point? (...) What is the point of this post? Do you agree with Tony? Do you think he is wrong? Scott A (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Thank you, Britain.
|
|
(...) I addressed that in another post (it is deep in the "War" war). Lord Robertson is either fooled by faked evidence, in on the gag, or the evidence does actualy exist. (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Thank you, Britain.
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GKLyuC.EK9@lugnet.com... (...) What's new? They have been saying this everyday. And yet everyday is a 'toughest warning yet' Now they seem to be saying everyday they have conclusive (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Gotta love Oracle...
|
|
...anything for some cheap advertising. (URL) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Yet another efficient way...
|
|
... to kill each other. (URL) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Thank you, Britain.
|
|
(...) Also: "Science can't make that choice for us, only the moral power of a world acting as a community can." But then from the same article: "This is a battle with only one outcome: our victory, not theirs," A rather naive view of battle. and: (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Thank you, Britain.
|
|
From: (URL) Blair: "if they could have murdered not 7,000 but 70,000 does anyone doubt they would have done so and rejoiced?" From: (URL) one of the toughest warnings yet to the Taliban from a Western leader, Blair said there could be no compromise (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: War
|
|
(...) of allowing them to give us a good beating (...) us at cricket and they will forget we are (...) P'haps 'cos it's too hard to play cricket in a kilt... ROSCO FUT: .o-t.fun (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: War
|
|
For sake of clarity in this discussion, I think that Saddam Hussein is a sick and twisted individual who has perpetrated much evil in this world and I would walk with a lighter step if I found out that he were killed. That said, I can go on and say (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: War
|
|
(...) Well, my point has always been that even if no one is "free" of blame (or fault or responsibility, to use the language of that prior debate), someone is almost invariably demonstrably and culpably more responsible for the event. If, (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The big lie
|
|
(...) Because it was expensive. Everything has a price and sometimes we're not willing to pay it. (...) I agree with the final comment. Why would a government agency provide more sure widget maintenance than would a private corporation. (...) I'm (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
