Subject:
|
Re: Thank you, Britain.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Oct 2001 03:02:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
346 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> From: http://politics.guardian.co.uk/labour2001/story/0,1414,562269,00.html
>
> Mr Blair: "if they could have murdered not 7,000 but 70,000 does anyone
> doubt they would have done so and rejoiced?"
Also: "Science can't make that choice for us, only the moral power of a world
acting as a community can."
But then from the same article: "This is a battle with only one outcome: our
victory, not theirs,"
A rather naive view of battle.
and: "Be in no doubt Bin Laden and his people organised this atrocity,"
Most have yet to see any evidence (assuming it exists).
> From: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/world/A57602-2001Oct2.html
>
> In one of the toughest warnings yet to the Taliban from a Western leader,
> Blair said there could be no compromise with terrorism and promised Britain
> would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the United States in the struggle.
>
> Blair gave no indication of when military action might start. He said the
> main target would be bin Laden. But if the Taliban do not surrender the
> terrorists, he said, action would also aim to "eliminate their military
> hardware, cut off their finances, disrupt their supplies, target their
> troops, not civilians."
>
> Blair: "I say to the Taliban: surrender the terrorist or surrender power.
> It's your choice."
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Thank you, Britain.
|
| (...) I addressed that in another post (it is deep in the "War" war). Lord Robertson is either fooled by faked evidence, in on the gag, or the evidence does actualy exist. (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Thank you, Britain.
|
| From: (URL) Blair: "if they could have murdered not 7,000 but 70,000 does anyone doubt they would have done so and rejoiced?" From: (URL) one of the toughest warnings yet to the Taliban from a Western leader, Blair said there could be no compromise (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
