Subject:
|
Re: Thank you, Mr Blair.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Oct 2001 08:09:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1140 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> From: http://politics.guardian.co.uk/labour2001/story/0,1414,562269,00.html
>
> Mr Blair: "if they could have murdered not 7,000 but 70,000 does anyone
> doubt they would have done so and rejoiced?"
Point?
>
> From: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/world/A57602-2001Oct2.html
>
> In one of the toughest warnings yet to the Taliban from a Western leader,
> Blair said there could be no compromise with terrorism and promised Britain
> would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the United States in the struggle.
>
> Blair gave no indication of when military action might start. He said the
> main target would be bin Laden. But if the Taliban do not surrender the
> terrorists, he said, action would also aim to "eliminate their military
> hardware, cut off their finances, disrupt their supplies, target their
> troops, not civilians."
>
> Blair: "I say to the Taliban: surrender the terrorist or surrender power.
> It's your choice."
What is the point of this post? Do you agree with Tony? Do you think he is
wrong?
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Thank you, Britain.
|
| From: (URL) Blair: "if they could have murdered not 7,000 but 70,000 does anyone doubt they would have done so and rejoiced?" From: (URL) one of the toughest warnings yet to the Taliban from a Western leader, Blair said there could be no compromise (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
