 | | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) It is has been my experience that maturity and age (being an adult) have nothing to do with each-other. Of course, what defines "maturity" is also widely varied, some taking it to be politeness even in the face of rudeness, and others take it (...) (19 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) Actually, I've found the behavior of some people on "adult" LEGO sites (like Lugnet) to be less mature than the norm on kid-oriented LEGO sites (like BZPower). There have been incidents and member actions on Lugnet that I wouldn't tolerate on (...) (19 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) I'm not sure that the sites that prompted your ponderings are really AFOL sites. Not a a critism of them, merely a thought that the standards of maturity might not be what you would like to get from an AFOL site Tim (19 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) extremes start when limits are reached. but where (what) are the limits? Some limits are quite clear and well determined : - topic (that's why this thread on lugnet.off-topic part of the site), - TOS,TOU, - federal, national, international (...) (19 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) Ah, but where do extremes start? Cheers Richie Dulin (19 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) **sighs** I guess when one's hobby is a toy, there will be children involved! :) Personally, I think it's bad for the overall AFOL community. I'll grant you, (A) I'm still sort of new to the community (even with 37 years of LEGO under my (...) (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) I was recently involved in something similar, when I took exception to the characterization of one site (Site A) by members of another, much larger site (Site B). Frankly, the postings struck me as petty and really kind of snide, and I posted (...) (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) Well, here's an important distinction: who's doing the saying? And in what capacity? Let's say AFOLS.com is run by Mortimer. And a frequent visitor to the AFOLS.com is Jezebelle. And there's another site called LEGOGEEKS.com, which they hate. (...) (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) I'm not sure right or wrong have much to do with it, given human nature. Right now, I could easily name three pairs of LEGO-related web sites where your example could apply, including one I run. So I don't think this is anything new. (...) (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
(...) I don't see what is wrong with it so long as it's not taken to extremes. Tim (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
|
While not naming any specific sites, I would be interested in hearing the Community's thoughts on whether you think it right or wrong for one AFOL site to talk about another AFOL site. For purposes of this discussion, we will assume that by talk I (...) (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Test Lugnet 3
|
|
Test 3 Test 3 Test 3 Test 3 Test 3 Test 3 (19 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Who needs a kitchen anyway?
|
|
I already have four of them in the livingroom and one in my PC room, so I can't possibly make room for yet another. But the price is so low, and this chance just won't come again. What am I to do? Ah, what the...! (URL) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Spider-man 3?
|
|
(...) 6 of the new sets are out now. New style Symbiote, Spiderman, Sandman, Young Green Goblin, and Ravage are out. A number of the kits are what Mega calls super-tech Mecha. They combine super-tech elements (done in weird bionical style character (...) (19 years ago, 5-Apr-07, to lugnet.licensed.spiderman, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) and Rosses... ROSCO (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) Kung fu, or Shao-Lin Do, actually. They broke boards over us to test our meditative focus. This would be like that, only even more fun. (...) I was thinking of SNOT-spheres, not bricky ones. Those could hurt. (...) First building completed and (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) I know that as a karate (sorry if I named your disipline wrong) pupil, you would probably be able to withstand some legos being thrown at you, I would still recommend against it since if I'm not mistaken, didn't Houdini die from being punched (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) I'd do it. I would want face protection, but otherwise- sure. Throw a spherical Lego model at me for charity. I'll stand in an empty wading pool, we can collect the pieces for charity too! Tim (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) There may be a way to make some money off of this. I'm thinking of those dunking booths at fairs that have a person sitting over the water tank and people throw balls at a target so that the person gets dunked in the water. You could set one (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: peeron inventory
|
|
(...) If it was not you who sent the picture, I am sorry. I do agree Now that I have said some things that I should not have. Those are the examples you quoted above. I was fustrated at months of waiting for changes to appear and Dan didn't answer (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
