 | | Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!! —Kyle Beatty
|
| | | (...) stronger bastions of respectable journalism in the UK. In any case, I sent the following letter to the editor. It's couched in the usual over-assertive letter-to-the-editor style that seems the only way to get past the sub-editors. to: (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!! —Alex Cruz
|
| | | | | (...) How true. It always amuses me at how our society "shuns" those parts of the Bible that aren't all holy and pure. Guess what people? You have to deal with the bad AND the good because the original writers are trying to TELL you something (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!) —Felix Greco
|
| | | | I would encourage people disgusted by Fionnula Bourke's article to email their grievance at: icFeedback@mrn.co.uk my response: In your article "Councillor in child porn probe" Dec 29 2002, by Fionnula Bourke, you report the Brick Testament as a site (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!) —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | (...) I agree completely, I'm no authority but I would suppose that what's in the BT is no more so that in the Bible. That reference was ment to discredit that person in question and the BT was used to paint a futher despicable picture on the back (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!) —Steven Combs
|
| | | | | | | I would also add that a review of the 20 Questions article on BimP would shed a whole "lotta" light on the Reverend's view of the bible and it's message. Sheesh...don't journalist do their research anymore? This is simply nuts. Steven (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!) —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | | | Exactly! That is an excellent point Steve. I would think that all the positive reations and media attention Brendon's work has recv'd will stand on it own. Too bad the actions of one perv make other peoples names/work get dragged thru the mud. e (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!) —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | | | | | | Eric Sophie wrote in message ... (...) Eric, re this and your previous remark: the guy has been investigated for *allegations*. Not convicted. Innocent until proved guilty, remember? And given that the source of all our info on this so far is the (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!) —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | | | | | | True, true. I concede. e (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) I was googling around yesterday and found another paper that carried the story. No idea if they were just re-reporting what was said (URL) also found what I THINK is the website in question, but it appears to be gone (URL) google cached it (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!) —Joseph Williams
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Although it wasn't the article which made this elected(?) member resign, it can not be helping the court of public opinion, which he has to live in. This sort of drivel usually filters out and redflags the nominds so anyone who reads that (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!) —Steven Combs
|
| | | | | | | | BTW...have we heard from Brendan about this issue? Steven (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) That's the point exactly. Brendan has been scrupulous not to manufacture anything that you can't find right there in the verses he cites for each image. Like Kyle said... is this person anti Bible? (...) I would agree with the sentiment, Eric, (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Help defend the artist! —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | (...) Thanks, Lar, Happy New Year. e (21 years ago, 2-Jan-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!) —Harvey Henkelman
|
| | | | (...) This is what I had to say... I have been a LEGO® enthusiast since childhood, and I find Fionnula Bourke's report to be offensive in that it attempts to link "The Brick Testament" with the likes of child pornography. Brendan Powell Smith (the (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
