Subject:
|
Re: Sets vs. Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Jun 1999 12:29:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
543 times
|
| |
|
|
Bill Katz wrote in message ...
> John DiRienzo (jdiri14897@email.msn.com) wrote:
> : >The /inv part of lugnet is very cool for verifying completeness. I need • to
> : >contribute as I get new sets.
>
>
> : I should do that, too. Maybe I will send him ALL the Castle • inventories,
> : except for this blasted 1960 set.
>
> Note that Margo Kubiak has already done that. SHe has complete inventories
> for castle and pirates, and has just done space. Along with Tim Vattima's
> town inventories, that covers a great percentage of the sets. THe space
> inventories are not yet published.
>
> You'd do more help double checking Margo's work than starting your own • format.
> BTW, she (anotehr castle completist) hasn't heard of 1960 either.
>
> BTW^2 John, do you have the plans for hte Wheatabix castle?
>
> -Bill
No, no instructions to that as yet. Why, do you?? Want to trade? I
guess I could look at the /inv site again, its been awhile and it was not
very complete at the time. I guess I could check up on the ones that are
there. I found some minor differences with the Yellow Castle when I used
its inventory (I don't if it was Margo's or not).
--
Have fun!
John ( ig88888888@stlnet.com ) remove NOSPAM:
John's Lego Web Trade Page:
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego/index.htm
MOC,CA[cl,bf,cr,fm,bk+++ wp,dm,rk,df++ fk-]++++(6035)
SW,TR,old(456)+++ TO++ PI,SP+ DU--
#+++++ S LS¼ Hy? M+ A+++ LM-- IC12m
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Sets vs. Parts
|
| John DiRienzo (jdiri14897@email.msn.com) wrote: : >The /inv part of lugnet is very cool for verifying completeness. I need to : >contribute as I get new sets. : I should do that, too. Maybe I will send him ALL the Castle inventories, : except for (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
