| |
In lugnet.market.theory, Tom McDonald writes:
> > Tom, please! I am afraid Lugnet would be so bland if you were so busy
> > with all this stuff.
>
> Thanks, that's quite a compliment. But Sproaticus and James Brown (no, not
> that one, the other one) are both very funny. I didn't mention John Neal's
> name here because he's almost funny and that's not the same. ;)
Aww shucks, Tom, I couldn't fill your shoes.(1)
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
1:except possibly with spamcake. ;-)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Sets vs. Parts
|
| (...) Out of all us Larritarians, Tom, I think *you're* the most brain-washed. I half-expect you to write "Mega-dittos from the West Coast, Lar" after each of his posts;-) -John "I'm too sexy for humor" Neal (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Sets vs. Parts
|
| (...) Ouch! That certainly wasn't me, and I'd be willing to bet a red 2x4 it wasn't Mike Stanley either ;) (...) Yes, Todd has an amazing patience and thought-out methodology. One concern of mine is that I'll finally get to meet the Lehman's and (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
