Subject:
|
Re: FOTW at KMART
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.shopping
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Sep 1999 14:17:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
364 times
|
| |
|
|
John DiRienzo wrote:
>
> In a way, this law makes a lot more sense than many others on the books.
> In my area, a certain grocery chain is notorious for mislabeling their items
Which chain? I haven't noticed that at Dierbergs or Schnucks.
> I think that law enforces retailers
> to be responsible about their pricing, and it could be useful (we don't have
> such a law yet).
Right, that's the idea. It prevents a form of bait and switch. I was
trained on that law at a convenience store in St. Louis County (Rock
Hill) in 1989. So the law - if I was taught correctly - was there at
that time. You're in St. Louis (N. County?), right?
> In some places, the manager (or even a cashier) is
> allowed to tell the customer to leave and is allowed to refuse service.
That has been the policy at all retail places where I have worked
(Missouri and Illinois). As a cashier, I essentially owned the store
and could do whatever whenever.
> Others don't have that right. This probably should go to debate, or
> preferably end now.
Sorry. ;-)
--Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: FOTW at KMART
|
| Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) the (...) Meijer. (...) In a way, this law makes a lot more sense than many others on the books. In my area, a certain grocery chain is notorious for mislabeling their items (well, they don't even use price (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
