Subject:
|
Re: New Ideas for Jambalaya - anyone interested?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.jambalaya
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Sep 1999 18:35:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1819 times
|
| |
|
|
Chris wrote:
> I guess the way I'd read it, you would owe a train window and a green
> cylinder. What about using your original idea of following the rules in
> order with no going back? How would that interpret your scenario?
Paul says:
To follow the rules in strict order, you would owe just the train window.
> Something else that occurs to me is when do you cancel and write the
> rules? Before or after you trade? I figure after, or it would be just
> too tempting to write rules that identify and help your specific
> situation. OTOH, you could cancel a rule, trade and enact a new one in
> that order. It would help the above scenario, without being really open
> to abuse.
>
> Chris
I think you take out the rule you used to trade with (in this case , Rule 1)
then put in a new one.
Paul, who has to fly to Ireland 2 days after returning from Cincinnati.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Ideas for Jambalaya - anyone interested?
|
| Paul Sinasohn expounded: (...) I guess the way I'd read it, you would owe a train window and a green cylinder. What about using your original idea of following the rules in order with no going back? How would that interpret your scenario? Something (...) (27 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
