Subject:
|
Re: New Ideas for Jambalaya - anyone interested?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.jambalaya
|
Date:
|
Tue, 21 Sep 1999 23:36:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
533 times
|
| |
|
|
What happens if two rules conflict? Or are mutually exclusive?
Should you only follow one rule in the box for the time you have it? (I would
say no)
Should you have to follow the rules in numerical order as you trade with the
box? (I think yes - no going back and re-thinking)
I like the idea of personality stuff, but I think it should be limited to
pictures (4x6 or smaller)to save on weight.
You should be able to add back an expired rule if you like it, but not one
that you caused to expire.
Paul, who sometimes plays by the rules...and sometimes just goes by the book.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Ideas for Jambalaya - anyone interested?
|
| (...) Like, if you take tiles, replace with slopes AND if you take tiles replace with windows? I suppose that it should be against the rules to make rules that are mutually exclusive. So if you wanted to add the tiles -> windows rule, you would have (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Ideas for Jambalaya - anyone interested?
|
| (...) Well, it looks like there is some interest in the game box, so let's flesh the idea out a little bit. "Must point with your elbow" would indeed not be very usefull for a game like this, so we'll have to give some thought to the form of rules (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
