Subject:
|
Re: GB#3 and the future of Jambalaya
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.jambalaya
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Mar 2000 18:20:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6098 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
> > Perhaps a better way to handle the parts people don't want is for people to
> > announce what they have in a post here. Then, people who want the stuff
> > people are putting up, can say "hey I'd like that, I'll x.com you some bucks
> > to cover the postage". Presumably the person interested in the parts will
> > have put up their own list. Of course there will end up being some parts
> > absolutely no one is interested in. If after months of your list being made
> > available, no one has bitten, you can probably feel comfortable in
> > circularly filing the parts.
>
> This sounds suspiciously like .buy-sell-trade. Or do you mean that we
> c/should do this, just to the extent of matching up box throwers to box
> catchers?
Not really, because what I'm suggesting doesn't require one to one
reciprocity. The idea is to offer stuff up which might not be worth the
trouble of a deal on bst, in the hopes that someone can use it. In
exchange, I hope to be able to score a few interesting bits that someone
else doesn't really need.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: GB#3 and the future of Jambalaya
|
| (...) That's been my experience as well. I've only gotten two boxes, though. Actually, the box I'm sitting on[1] right now does have some interesting pieces, from a historical perspective. Not stuff I want myself, but I'm glad to have seen them in (...) (27 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
