| |
In lugnet.town, Bradley Dale writes:
> In lugnet.town, James Brown writes:
> > In lugnet.town, Bradley Dale writes:
> > > In lugnet.town, Constantine Hannaher writes:
> > > > Lego separated the cost of shipping in the Shop at Home catalog, if I • remember
> > > > correctly, so that the price of the individual items could be compared to • other
> > > > sources more easily.
> > >
> > > Well it sucks! At least in Canada, where a "3.99 US" set has $4.50 US
> > > shipping. And they the want our taxes in US$..... Now I never use S@H, even
> > > though I would use it every month if not for the misleading and unreasonable
> > > princing changes.
> >
> > So you think it makes more sense for Lego to charge $8.49 for that set?
>
> No, but they used to get by charging about $4.50. Shipping charges didn't used
> to be huge on the little sets.
I agree with the people who think lego should keep Jack Stone as a DUplo set
or something on that order, and still have a town or city theme for older
people, say from ages 10-up. they shouldnt kill the popular town theme for a
newer theme that appeals just to kids. why not make more themes that appeal
for teenagers and AFOLs on the side? joe
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
