Subject:
|
Re: Read Sales in the Subset
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:19:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1525 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Paul Baulch wrote:
| |
It reminds me of how they made
to circumvent the substantial shortcoming of
which someone in loc.au had the ignorance to call juniorized... he/she
obviously needed to spend more time building.
|
I remember said converstation and reacanted immediately. Though I will point out
that, in context, it was an odd choice. The model it came in made no use of the
peice’s improved functionality. And yes, I have spent more time building and
appreciated said peice.
James (who understands that Paul wasn’t making a personal comment)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Read Sales in the Subset
|
| (...) It's hard not to, unless you attach it so the wings hang off the sides unattached to anything. It's got a 2x4 base instead of a 2x2, which immediately gives you twice as much gripping power. (20 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Read Sales in the Subset
|
| (...) Do you know why they made that piece? Along with [LDrawPart 2458:1] They provide a way of connecting modules without having the Technic peg migrate to the wrong side when disconnecting. The two-pronged version provides a way to connect modules (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
