Subject:
|
Re: Read Sales in the Subset
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Jul 2004 04:42:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1413 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.loc.au, Richie Dulin wrote:
> > In lugnet.loc.au, Pete White wrote:
> > > That is just to annoy Richie.
> >
> > I've been quietly fuming ever since I read Michael's post. A blue piece!? How
> > could they!? Don't they undertstand their fan base!?
> >
> > No wonder it's called blue.
> >
> > I don't know what I'm going to do, but I'm certainly going to be buying less of
> > their blue product in future!
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Richie (waiting for someone to pounce on this post and direct it to .color).
>
> Na. Not serious enough. It was almost TOO predictable. Better luck next time.
Not serious enough!? It's blue! You just don't understand how seriously some
people (well, one people) feel about this colour...
> But if it's unfounded criticism you fancy, you spelt understand wrong.
That's obly because I was so irate about the inclussion of *blue* in an
otherwise exellent set!
;-)
Cheers
Richie Dulin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Read Sales in the Subset
|
| (...) Na. Not serious enough. It was almost TOO predictable. Better luck next time. But if it's unfounded criticism you fancy, you spelt understand wrong. Hope that helps! (20 years ago, 15-Jul-04, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
