To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.auOpen lugnet.loc.au in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Australia / *13978 (-20)
  Re: Battle! (was Re: loc.au stats (was - all quiet on the loc.au front))
 
(...) Hello Richard I would like to accept your invitation (challenge?) to war. Last year my son and I visited Richie and met pete too. I have an army, or at least the bricks n bits to make one. I have not played BrikWars before, however have (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: valuing lego for insurance purposes
 
(...) I have my LEGO collection insured under a special collection agengy insurance. I tried to have my renter's insurance thru ALL STATE give me a quote but they did seem to understand that my collection of lEGO was worth $20,000. They wanted to (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Re: valuing lego for insurance purposes
 
Frances in Tassie has her Lego insured as a separate collection. Better to do it this way rather than through the general household insurance. I believe (though I'm happy to be corrected) that she used Bricklink prices as evidence of the value of (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: valuing lego for insurance purposes
 
(...) Easy: Ring your current insurance company and ask what they will accept. (A good point to start at will be a list of purchases and how much you paid. Receipts would be good too. Keep in mind that Lego might not be a particularly risky (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  valuing lego for insurance purposes
 
I have a large collection of lego including sets purchased new, sets purchased second hand and parts (some from sets I have bought and kept only some parts from but most from second hand sources). The parts are in various levels of quality (some are (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: My average set
 
(...) God Damn you people! thanks to this Mindless discussion I now look at every word I see and start to think of abbreviations that word could have. Damn it, Damn it, Damn IT! Although some of them have been interesting. I shouldn't have suggested (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: My average set
 
(...) Didn't they tell you: pete.w = Pete Eventually Tries Every Word. Cheers Richie Dulin (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Re: My average set
 
(...) OMG! AFAK this is totally awesome news. I TY personally for bringing this to my attention. (...) Excellent! Any proposed dates for when we will reach the full term for the 7 letter variety Re: ROFLMAO (...) Contact them I did! IANAL, but after (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Re: My average set
 
(...) Worse than Y2K....more impactive than IPV6 ...its..... TLA Overload. Yes...you heard it here first... Three Letter Acronym Overload 2005 is the year we completely ran out of three letter acronyms. Due to increasing use of TLA's in the computer (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Re: My average set
 
(...) Oh no Peter, not again Okay, I cant resist..... This game is........Agonising But Stimulating, I truly........Attempted Bypassing Suffering, It got the better of me.....Admittedly Boldly Submit, Then my...... Anticipation Bended Sadly, Truth (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Re: My average set
 
(...) Accessible Bald Spot, Austrian Boot Stomp, Active Butt Scratching, Acute Bile Shortage, Accumulated Bowel Sludge, Amiable Beer Shower, Acquired Bite Syndrome pete.w (Acronyms Barely Spoken) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Re: My average set
 
(...) Actually seconds after I posted (isn't that always the way) I thought, "Gee, you probably were already well aware of that term, considering your interests." It sort of funny, in a weird sort of way, that you didn't link the two. Of course, (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Re: Battle! (was Re: loc.au stats (was - all quiet on the loc.au front))
 
(...) Hi Richard! (...) Cool. I'll be there. (Though, if you could email me directions, it would assist my timely arrival). (...) Cool. 350 points is an interesting amount. Enough for a unit of cavalry, one of infantry, a commander, and a couple of (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: My average set
 
(...) LOL! I deal with the ABS from time to time, use their stats regularly, and have several of their publications on my bookshelf... and yet the ABS/ABS link had never occured to me. Weird, huh? Richie Dulin (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Re: My average set
 
In lugnet.loc.au, Richie Dulin wrote: Hey Richie, While discussing gambling in Aus and searching out relevant sites, with another AFOL, I came across an interesting abbreviation that I thought, you might appreciate..... ABS = Australian Bureau of (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Re: Would someone from TLG please explain the mad specials on S@H Australia site?
 
It would appear that they're the same as in Europe, however, that still doesn't explain or justify the extreme smallness of the discount amount, especially given the higher cost of postage us Aussies have to put up with. Which is my reason for, as (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Would someone from TLG please explain the mad specials on S@H Australia site?
 
Question: Are the specials we are getting the same as those that europeans are getting? If not, that is definatly a reason to complain. (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Would someone from TLG please explain the mad specials on S@H Australia site?
 
I am looking at the specials on the LEGO Shop At Home website and I simply cannot believe the poor quality of the specials listed on the site. For instance the 10021 USS Constellation has been marked down from the original price of $99.95 to a (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Star Wars Chess Set MOC
 
(...) Definitely, Leia should be queen and Luke king. Leaves yoda out, but Luke as queen is just.. well, wrong. (20 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Happy New Year!
 
Happy New Year from Europe! Hope it is a good one for all. Take care... Mel (Home soon... and would be nice to see my name changed! *hint@admin*) (20 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR