Subject:
|
Re: valuing lego for insurance purposes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:50:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1728 times
|
| |
|
|
Frances in Tassie has her Lego insured as a separate collection. Better to
do it this way rather than through the general household insurance. I
believe (though I'm happy to be corrected) that she used Bricklink prices as
evidence of the value of sets and parts.
I believe anything can be insured if you so choose to do so (collection
wise). You just have to provide a comprehensive list and provide proof of
value. Proof that you own it can be troublesome if you don't have receipts -
but maybe a photograph of the collection will suffice.
In theory we should list all of our CDs and DVDs in a special list too -
especially if you have a lot of them :)
cheers
SAB
"Richie Dulin" <rdulin@REMOVEmla.com.au> wrote in message
news:I9x3rx.20K7@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.general, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> > How should I come up with a value for my collection that reflects its • true
> > value and (more to the point) that the insurance company will accept.
>
> Easy: Ring your current insurance company and ask what they will accept.
>
> (A good point to start at will be a list of purchases and how much you • paid.
> Receipts would be good too. Keep in mind that Lego might not be a • particularly
> risky collectible...).
>
> Cheers
>
> Richie Dulin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: valuing lego for insurance purposes
|
| (...) Easy: Ring your current insurance company and ask what they will accept. (A good point to start at will be a list of purchases and how much you paid. Receipts would be good too. Keep in mind that Lego might not be a particularly risky (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
