Subject:
|
Re: valuing lego for insurance purposes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:58:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1629 times
|
| |
|
|
Sue Ann Barber wrote:
> "Jonathan Wilson" <jonwil@tpgi.com.au> wrote in message
> news:IAL6w5.xFL@lugnet.com...
>
> > > Easy: Ring your current insurance company and ask what they will accept.
> > >
> > > (A good point to start at will be a list of purchases and how much you
>
> paid.
>
> > > Receipts would be good too. Keep in mind that Lego might not be a
>
> particularly
>
> > > risky collectible...).
> >
> > The insurance company wants a list.
> >
> > I have no clue what all this stuff is worth.
> > Or how much I paid for the various items in my collection.
> > Any ideas on how to come up with a value that the insurance will accept?
>
>
> Well, sets are the easy part - you could take the average listing value off
> of Bricklink. Doesn't matter what you really paid for as it's unlikely
> you'll have receipts. At least Bricklink will give you an average
> replacement price per set. .
>
> Parts are a little bit more tricky. Do they want you to list each individual
> piece that isn't part of a set? Probably not too hard if you have things
> sorted out. You could get the average price for these off of Bricklink too I
> suppose.
Hmmm, I was hoping for a way to do this that didnt involve going through
and building every set in my collection and then valuing each set plus all
the parts that are left.
Assume they dont want lists of individual parts, is there another sutable
way to come up with a $ value for the parts?
I guess that $ values for individual parts would be a good idea for the
"hard to find" parts (like the classic space printed 1 x 6 x 5 bricks and
the red round shields and stuff) then $ values for all the sets I have
instructions for... Then come up with some other $ value for whats left...
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: valuing lego for insurance purposes
|
| (...) How good's your memory? How about making a list of all the sets you've acquired over the years (don't do it in one hit, take a few days), making a note of the set number and number of pieces. See what you can come up with. (No need to build (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | Re: valuing lego for insurance purposes
|
| For many years we have been keeping a list of the Lego instructions we have to help prioritise our purchases (ie, buy instructions/sets we don't have first). Note, instructions do not necessarily mean sets, but close. Somewhere along the line we (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: valuing lego for insurance purposes
|
| "Jonathan Wilson" <jonwil@tpgi.com.au> wrote in message news:IAL6w5.xFL@lugnet.com... (...) paid. (...) particularly (...) Well, sets are the easy part - you could take the average listing value off of Bricklink. Doesn't matter what you really paid (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
