 | | Re: SALE PRICES [inc. 6975 fo $35 AUS]
|
|
(...) Is that counting the 'Village People' and 'Carnival in Rio' themes ? (...) There must be more ! Dave, your monkeys are resting in the Duplo-Egg-Humididome. pete.w (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Roll Call
|
|
(...) Thanks for the welcome! (and thanks for getting us put on the map (the other Pete also), I'd missed that thread until you mentioned it, we often get forgotten down here...) Part of my reason for lurking was that I never felt I had anything to (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: SALE PRICES [inc. 6975 fo $35 AUS]
|
|
(...) Roger, roger -- was just about to de-Lugnet and do some work. I must say, some of those bargains of Ben's are very tempting, but I'm going to resist. The fugly factor helps a lot. 6709 is fantastic value for $3, but unfortunately there are (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | RE: SALE PRICES [inc. 6975 fo $35 AUS]
|
|
(...) Just like I do with all my Aquazone...It's in a place that's very hard to see, in a location I'm not often at [eg in Colac] :) [Actually, the UFO's and insectoids are also there :), but so are the town, castle, pirates and blacktron 1 and 2 (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: SALE PRICES [inc. 6975 fo $35 AUS]
|
|
(...) A horse, a bush, even a snake I think. (...) Hey, I have one already, I just try not to look at it. (Completists will go to any depths...) pete.w (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | RE: SALE PRICES [inc. 6975 fo $35 AUS]
|
|
(...) That's right....They had 39 of them Yesterday ! [I doubt there's that many now however :) ] Also, I've got to agree with the 6150 description, although it won't stop me getting one at that price. Benjamin Whytcross (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: SALE PRICES [inc. 6975 fo $35 AUS]
|
|
(...) That 6150 is one ugly set. Dave Low, you there 6709's $3. pete.w (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Roll Call
|
|
"Rachel Kingston" <kingston@spirit.com.au> wrote in message news:Fv0F1F.F4H@lugnet.com... (...) competant (...) The 1.5 set has a few cool technic parts that 1 hasn't, and is minus a couple of very ordinary parts. It's also got an upgraded (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Standards for LEGO
|
|
"Peter Callaway" <pcallaway@bmcl.com.au> wrote in message news:Fv098q.Lxp@lugnet.com... (...) moving (...) suppliment (...) Argh! I got 4100 and 1170 confused *starts self-flagelation with birch sticks* Bah, I've been studying too much mining (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Standards for LEGO
|
|
(...) What say we at loc.au develop the first lego Structural code, we call it (Australian Lego Stadard) ALS2000. And Yes the first appendix can be Appendix L < Engineering Geek Discussion mode> Hmm See I'd have to disagree with the Lego being akin (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | SALE PRICES [inc. 6975 fo $35 AUS]
|
|
For anyone interested, the sale prices of the folling are a little lower than reported: 6150 $20 6709 $3 4280 $4.99 4211 $4.99 4221 $4.99 6975 $35 [That's right, and they only have 8 so first in :) ] NOTE: these prices are with the 30% taken off, (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back!
|
|
(...) after. (...) Australia, New Zealand and....Canada ? No...I was just thinking on the fly and wondering what one could term a group that encompasses both Australia and New Zealand could be called. ANZAC is a term used to cover soldiers from both (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back!
|
|
(...) ANZACLUG? What's the C for? (Not that Canadians wouldn't be welcome, I'm sure--it's just that pesky airfare thing.) best LFB (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Roll Call
|
|
Oops sorry, maybe it was Kerry, well maybe if we are both lucky we will get the RIS for xmas, and then we can help each other out :-) I agree with the Duplo comments, I too think that the tunnel is extremely ugly, but my son and daughter want one (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Changes to LUGMAP available for review at Development site.
|
|
First, sorry for the crazy cross-posting of this article but I wanted to get everyone that requested a change to the maps all at once. I have set follow-ups to lugnet.org but please feel free to add relevent groups to your followup posts. This way (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.org, lugnet.org.ca, lugnet.org.nl, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.jp, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.loc.ca.on.tor) !
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Roll Call
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Rachel Kingston writes: Thanks for the welcome (and everyone else too!) (...) I think you've got me confused with Kerry here. I'm interested in getting into Technic and Mindstorms but haven't done so yet (it's that single salary (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Roll Call
|
|
David Drew wrote in message ... (...) to (...) And you call yourself a Technic enthusiast?!? Pah!!! :-) I've broken at least two Technic beams building stuff that simply couldn't take the forces on the structure. Fallen in the line of duty, man!!! (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Roll Call
|
|
Hi Dierdre :-) Nice to meet you :-) The more women here the better I think, sometimes I do feel a little outnumbered. Though all the guys here are great. I am aiming to get into technic soon, as I really want the RIS (maybe for xmas, I have started (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Australian Standards for LEGO
|
|
(...) Guys, guys. C'mon! Concrete? Loadings? I'd at least put it in as a suppliment to AS4100, since perhaps Parts 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are directly applicable. Structural LEGO is more akin to steel than concrete, and the loading code is only used to (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: Australian Roll Call
|
|
"Santosh" <santosh@student.unsw.edu.au> wrote in message news:FuzvHu.B20@lugnet.com... (...) Actually, technic would be more along the lines of AS1170 (minus the moving parts of course) due to the beams and pin connectors. :) David Drew. (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
