Subject:
|
Re: I'm back!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 May 2000 21:27:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1546 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
>
>
> Peter White wrote:
>
> > We were getting worried about the West Coast.
> > Don't forget to patronise loc.au, it's where most discussion takes place.
> > Good luck with getting ftf meetings happening, we're just about to have our
> > third this June 4. Be sure to have a look at the pics to be posted soon • after.
> >
> > pete.w <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au>
> > (An Australian-NZ users group by 2001 ! LUGANZ ? ANZACLUG ? )
>
> ANZACLUG? What's the C for? (Not that Canadians wouldn't be welcome, I'm
> sure--it's just that pesky airfare thing.)
Australia, New Zealand and....Canada ?
No...I was just thinking on the fly and wondering what one could term a group
that encompasses both Australia and New Zealand could be called.
ANZAC is a term used to cover soldiers from both countries who fought overseas
during both World Wars, Australian & New Zealand Army Corps.
I guess we better get rid of the Army Corp.
Hey, why not make it a former British Commonwealth thing and have as our
patron the Queen...........of Tonga ! ;^) (maybe the Danish queen ?)
pete.w <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: I'm back!
|
| (...) ANZACLUG? What's the C for? (Not that Canadians wouldn't be welcome, I'm sure--it's just that pesky airfare thing.) best LFB (26 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
