Results 601 – 620 of about 1400.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
 | | Re: A new area of LEGO.com: the Build section
|
| hanks to everyone for the positive comments! Here are some answers to various people's questions: (...) Yes, I hope we'll eventually get to what exactly the colors are... I think the 84 was colors currently in production -- it might be colors that (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| "Kevin Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote in message news:GCyzMv.InD@lugnet.com... (...) What? You mean like I wouldnt have dreamt of e-commerce? Or they they would sell bulk bricks, which I could have done 40 years ago? Or that they might sell trains, (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| (...) I can't speak for the UK experience, but here in the US the effects have been incredibly cool. Absolutely amazing actually. Somewhere in my basement I have an unopened case of 5542's that I was keeping just for the clear train glass. Now I can (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| (...) I think that's a bit of an absolutist portrayal, don't you? The point is that people have been trying to explain *why* it is the way it is, not trying to defend it or say it's necessarily the right way of doing something, given infinite time (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Re: Re-released sets and Brickfest
|
| "Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3B16505D.2847@m...ing.com... (...) be (...) Brickfest (...) Very true on both counts. That was more of a tongue in cheek suggestion. Tim (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Re: A new area of LEGO.com: the Build section
|
| (...) Lots of fascinating info just in the first "issue." Perhaps the most interesting to me, possibly because I was obsessed for so long with finding this set, was this bit about the 396 Thatcher Perkins set from 1976: "The American market was (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| (...) I think it is quite pertinent, although at this point it might be more useful to ask why TLC is not producing NEW sets that supplement existing or previously popular themes. (I admit I AM biased in that I like the idea of having some pieces (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Re: the whole truth and nothing but the truth
|
| (...) Yay! Not the sets I would have chosen, but I hope this trial balloon floats to TLC's liking and makes other stuff possible down the road! I am up for 2-3 of each of the above. (...) Right! Brad emailed me yesterday and spilled the beans on the (...) (23 years ago, 23-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| (...) I agree, and I had a sneaking feeling that if we compared notes we would find much congruence between our theories. Getting back to the topic of pirates, if, as you noted, Pirates sold so well at its introduction, and if, as I surmised, it (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| (...) I'd rather not, thank you, this not being the lugnet.off-topic.deb...n-sequitor group. (...) Do me a favor and address me for the posts I make, and not for the posts that others may or may not have made in the past. I've been gone awhile, and (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| (...) As quasi-rants tend to be...deal! (...) OMG, this same "tired" argument every time! We already know they are taking a bath on these kinds of sets, or at least the retailers are -- go check out the RR stuff on sale at TRU right now. How do I (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| (...) Well, as a fan who would enjoy having an easier time of obtaining certain elements I hope that the last part is true. Of course, we have this discussion all the time -- and if we are not having it at some point, we cycle back to it eventually. (...) (23 years ago, 12-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Old Parts in Legend Sets?
|
| I will be curious when the Guarded Inn arrives in July. Will it have the old style minifig heads with no open top? Or the newer style with the hole on top with what looks like the Mercedes emblem over the hole. I tend to think that the Legend sets (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jun-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| (...) That's a nice slip into quasi-rant mode, but it's rather nonsequitor. Regardless, yes, I might wonder if bricks and minifigures are "tired" (in terms of buyer interest) since LEGO continues to juniorize their product (ie pitch them at younger (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
sets
(score: 0.881)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
