Subject:
|
Re: Fansploitation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 21:58:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
506 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Lester Witter writes:
> I think the issue with TLG may be litigation avoidance. If LEGO receives a
> bunch of ideas and designs but does not obtain the rights then they must check
> every new design they market against the entries to insure that there is no
> similarities. Even if their internal desgn group never looked at the contest
> entries and developed something independnetly, the fact that they
> recieved something simiar could be a problem.
Good point. Combining subthreads... would a non exclusive royalty free
license granted at entry solve that problem? IANAL so I am just guessing
wildly but I think it might.
I have to reiterate my opinion that I feel the disparagement of this contest
is a bit overblown, and I regret I may have fueled it a bit myself.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Fansploitation
|
| (...) big (...) fine (...) to (...) I think the issue with TLG may be litigation avoidance. If LEGO receives a bunch of ideas and designs but does not obtain the rights then they must check every new design they market against the entries to insure (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
19 Messages in This Thread: ![Fansploitation -Suzanne D. Rich (3-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation -Larry Pieniazek (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation -Mike Walsh (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation -Suzanne D. Rich (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation -Mark Sandlin (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation -Larry Pieniazek (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![D.L. Blair, Inc. (was: Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation)) -Todd Lehman (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.build.contests)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: D.L. Blair, Inc. (was: Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation)) -Tim Courtney (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.publish)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: D.L. Blair, Inc. -Sean Harrington (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.publish)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation -Bryan Kinkel (5-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation -Suzanne D. Rich (5-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation -Gary Istok (5-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation -John Neal (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Fansploitation -Lawrence Wilkes (4-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Fansploitation -John Matthews (5-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Fansploitation -Christopher Masi (5-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Fansploitation -Lester Witter (5-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Fansploitation -Eric Brok (8-Jan-01 to lugnet.lego.direct)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|