 | | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote: <snip> (...) This would be a good thing. I'd say it ought to just present the facts in a fairly dry way. All the "evangelists" would have a copy and just post it in reply. I could take a swag, I guess. (26 years ago, 29-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) Swag: (done rather quickly, so hack away) -- begin -- To old and new readers of RTL: There is another place to share the joy of Lego, make friends, share ideas, and participate in our special community. LUGNET is a privately hosted, fan (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) Drat. Here's something: Note that unlike usenet, LUGNET is a private service and in order to participate you will need to reveal your real name. Further, LUGNET requires you to acknowledge that you will abide by the LUGNET terms and conditions (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) ...<snip> I suggest that the letter be shorter, and not include every detail of Lugnet. I could group RTL in to the following, those who have not heard of Lugnet, and those that have but aren't leaving for whatever reason. I suggest that the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
Larry, This is a great start! My edits/suggestions/comments below... --Todd (...) ^^^...^^^ I wonder if there is another salutation which would suggest inside-hood -- such as "fellow RTL'ers:" -- rather than possible outside-hood...? Not that (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message <3662c0ff.8026676@lu...et.com>... <snipped Todd's translation of Larry's excellent first stab at the letter... (...) Todd, it never ceases to amaze me how some people can turn words around and make me see things from a (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ It's probably best to say "the LUGNET newsgroups" here because the thing that will be known later as "LUGNET" doesn't exist yet. And certainly, the service that exists there now with the newsgroups is only a small part of what (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) Maybe "Everyone can read the lugnet postings, but before posting new messages, you must agree to follow some basic rules of netiquette and agree to conditions of use."? (...) ... or missed messages because your ISP didn't pick up some (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
Steve/Larry, I think these are good additions/changes... --Todd (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) ", so you are sure to find information in your area of interest." (...) Thanks for writing the post. Some advocacy is necessary for encouraging participation. Besides the post could be updated from time to time. (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) I'm on board with them. However my bandwidth just dried up. Can someone take a stab at a repost incorporating Todd's and Steve's changes? Do it as a single block and posters can mark it up again. Don't bother with revision bars, et al, none of (...) (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) "Robert M. Dye" <robdye@writeme.com> writes: (...) "Linc Smith" <ldsmith@pfc.forestry.ca> writes: (...) OK, we made up a couple buttons -- here is the page... (URL) are designed to link to the main root homepage (rather than the news page), (...) (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) I think so. From the body of text, it's not immediately apparent how to post and browse. Maybe you should just put a *short* introduction with a link to more details, and then have links to browsing, posting, and posting setup. For the (...) (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) can think of is "LUGNET: LEGO News, Weather, and Sports". That probably isn't the best thing to go with. Steve (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) Sounds like you've got an idea/concept/vision for some text, but you're not happy with the way it's coming out in words...? Maybe back up a bit -- block the end result out of your mind for a minute -- pretend someone is sitting next to you and (...) (26 years ago, 3-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
Well, we didn't finish this, did we? Here is a revised copy of the blurb incorporating all the changes I could find. Do people think with these revisions, it's good to go? -- start -- To fellow RTL'ers: There is another place to share the joy of (...) (26 years ago, 28-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) Posted. 'Twil be interesting to see what ensues. (26 years ago, 28-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) Looks good to me!! --Tood (26 years ago, 28-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
