Subject:
|
Re: 1x5, why not?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:46:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
953 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
"Bryan Wong" <green_paper@hotmail.com> writes:
> While on the topic of "introducing" pieces, I remember coming across
> the 5L technic axle not too long ago, in 8448 Super Street
> Sensation...
The 5L technic axle was introduced in 1998, I believe. There also exist
1x5 technic plates (two varieties), as well as 1x5 technic beams.
Fredrik
--
http://folk.uio.no/fredrigl/technic/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: 1x5, why not?
|
| (...) While on the topic of "introducing" pieces, I remember coming across the 5L technic axle not too long ago, in 8448 Super Street Sensation... -Bryan (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.general)
|
17 Messages in This Thread: ![1x5, why not? -David Brandes (21-Apr-02 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Erik Olson (22-Apr-02 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -James Powell (22-Apr-02 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Cary Clark (22-Apr-02 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Lindsay Frederick Braun (22-Apr-02 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Geoffrey Hyde (22-Apr-02 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 8x8 plate (was:1x5, why not?) -Ross Crawford (22-Apr-02 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Thomas Garrison (22-Apr-02 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Bryan Wong (22-Apr-02 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Ross Crawford (22-Apr-02 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Thomas Avery (23-Apr-02 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Ross Crawford (24-Apr-02 to lugnet.technic)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Henry Lim (22-Apr-02 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Henry Lim (22-Apr-02 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Kevin Loch (24-Apr-02 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: 1x5, why not? -Benton Jackson (24-Apr-02 to lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|