To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 36579
36578  |  36580
Subject: 
Re: 1x5, why not?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 04:07:06 GMT
Viewed: 
904 times
  
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Cary Clark wrote:

Here's some other introduction dates, according to Peeron:

1987 Brick 1 x 2 in Brown

It's worth noting that (according to Peeron[1]) this was only used to fill
horses' backs until 1994, and only became a regular architectural element
with the introduction of Wild West in 1995.  Its use in Castle sets
1987--1994 was in a more specialized role, akin to the use of DkGray in
minifig accessories for over a decade before the large-scale production of
DkGray bricks.

On a related note, brown was used (IIRC) in maxifig hair in <set:565 Moon
Landing> in 1975, twenty years before it came into common use for basic
bricks.  TLC moves much more quickly these days on introducing new colors
for the non-specialty elements. . .

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
TWS Garrison
tgarriso@math.purdue.edu
   http://www.math.purdue.edu/~tgarriso/

[1] Which is not yet System-complete---remember to inventory new sets as
you get them!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 1x5, why not?
 
(...) ... (...) ... That was my thought, too. I got some LEGO sets in the 80's and early 90's as an adult, and then lost interest until a couple of years ago. Once I started up again, I was surprised to see 1x6 tiles -- they were introduced in '95. (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.general)

17 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR