To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 3903
3902  |  3904
Subject: 
Re: 1x5, why not?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:33:40 GMT
Viewed: 
2549 times
  
In lugnet.dear-lego, Kevin Loch writes:
In lugnet.dear-lego, David Brandes writes:
Why hasn't anyone, in the 50+ years that the lego brick has been in
existence, created a 1x5 or 2x5 piece? Dave.

According to the instructions for 956, there is supposed to be
a 1x5 brick in red (#5 at bottom of page):

http://library.brickshelf.com/scans/0000/0956/0956-11.html

Of course no one has ever seen that piece in real life :)

KL

That sure looks like a mis-print to me. Every other layer has a 1x4 and a
1x1, some draftsman missed a line.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 1x5, why not?
 
(...) According to the instructions for 956, there is supposed to be a 1x5 brick in red (#5 at bottom of page): (URL) course no one has ever seen that piece in real life :) KL (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)

17 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR