Subject:
|
Re: 1x5, why not?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:13:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2160 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, David Brandes writes:
> Why hasn't anyone, in the 50+ years that the lego brick has been in
> existence, created a 1x5 or 2x5 piece? Dave.
According to the instructions for 956, there is supposed to be
a 1x5 brick in red (#5 at bottom of page):
http://library.brickshelf.com/scans/0000/0956/0956-11.html
Of course no one has ever seen that piece in real life :)
KL
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 1x5, why not?
|
| (...) That sure looks like a mis-print to me. Every other layer has a 1x4 and a 1x1, some draftsman missed a line. (22 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | 1x5, why not?
|
| Why hasn't anyone, in the 50+ years that the lego brick has been in existence, created a 1x5 or 2x5 piece? Dave. (22 years ago, 21-Apr-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
