To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 31667
31666  |  31668
Subject: 
Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:42:21 GMT
Viewed: 
1463 times
  
Kevin & All,

> > True, I think we will lose a generation of AFOL's simply because they do
> > not
> > have the same kind of sets LEGO used to make. I doubt many of us would be
> > here today if we did not fall in love with some series, whether it be
> > space,
> > town, castle, TECHNIC, or train.  it will be interesting to see in the next
> > 10 years or so.
> 
> I don't think falling in love with a series/theme is necessary for
> AFOL-ism... when I was a Lego-loving kid I had *no* themed sets because the
> very first sets-which-built-a-specific-model had only just started to
> appear, and there must be other AFOL's over 40 like me. We were hooked by
> the possibilities of the bricks, I think.

To that extent, true, the over 40 crowd (Which is cool in it's own way). But
I guess i was referring to the 20~20 year olds mostly, who grew up with the
themed sets, specifically trhe minifig sets, that built that strong
relationship.

> Whether kids nowadays could get hooked like that I don't know: a drawback of
> sets as opposed to piece assortments is that they do channel creativity, and
> with the decline of set quality in the stores and reduction of creativity
> potential, many kids may never realise the potential of the brick.

Well, that goes back to all just brick sets, such as BASIC sets, or LEGOLAND
/ whatever sets, and I think that depending on the individual, it can be a
channel to creativity or it can bolster it. I can't imagine the Town Junior
/ Jack Stone / Bionicle / Throwbots / etc. really inspire anything anymore,
as opposed to the sets of say, 1970-1998. (NOTE: Some people make excellent
MOC's out of Throwbots, Bionicle, etc. I am mostly referring to kids and
their attitudes and creativity of those)

I do think most of what LTC is not making a creative or longlasting
impression anymore, it is more a throwaway / discard toy after a few minutes
market. I think one of the TLCpeople said kids want to build sets faster, so
they made these for that reason. I think it is a negative direction, and
only time will tell if they can shore up that or not.

Anyway, I need to get SOME sleep tonight, good discussion, and good points.

Scott "Dreaming of that huge basement" S.
--






> 
> Kevin
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Craftsman Lego Kits & Custom models: http://www.lionsgatemodels.com
> Brickbay Lego parts store: http://www.brickbay.com/store.asp?p=Kevinw1
> eBay Lego auctions: http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/kevinw1/
> The Guild of Bricksmiths: http://www.bricksmiths.com
> Personal Lego Web page:
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/kwilson_tccs/lego.html



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
 
Scott E. Sanburn wrote in message ... (...) not (...) space, (...) I don't think falling in love with a series/theme is necessary for AFOL-ism... when I was a Lego-loving kid I had *no* themed sets because the very first (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)

14 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR