 | | Bionicle is not Technic —Dean Hystad
|
| | | Am I the only person who is annoyed by all the Bionicle posts that appear under technic? RoboRiders, Throbots, and Znap were never much of a problem because nobody ever posted anything about them. Or if they did, it was about a neat and useful part (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.general) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Michael Edwards
|
| | | | | It comes under Technic, all of the Parts are Technic, other than the mask and weapon -- Michael - - - Please reply on medwards@ukonline.co.uk Lugnet Member# 151 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lego (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Ronald Vallenduuk
|
| | | | | | "Michael Edwards" <medwards@ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message news:GAM9oG.LHC@lugnet.com... (...) What other parts? Duq (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Definitely not 8?( However that is only a feature of the web interface. Viewing news.lugnet.com/technic by default actually displays the technic group and all it's sub-groups. You can filter out all the sub-groups by clicking on the "View (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —David Arnon
|
| | | | | | (...) Same here! I even posted about it a while ago. (...) all (...) "View (...) That's true, I've used that option for a while but I had the feeling I'm missing something - If someone posts something that deals with bionicles _and_ in technic (and (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) You might want to have a look at the "skip filter" mechanism (URL) see if adding -.bionicle to your skip-filter does the trick for you. (I'm not promising that it will solve your problem, but it might make things a bit less annoying.) --Todd (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —David Arnon
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) _and_ (...) post (...) I'm (...) is (...) I usually only read the technic news group so if I understand correctly skipping the bionicle, roborider and slizer sub group will be equivalent to the "view plain" option of the technic group which I (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Ron Sedlmeyer
|
| | | | | | | | (...) But what I'd really like is the look of (URL) on the top and left side of the page but with (URL) for the messages (brief, technic ONLY, no subgroups). And have some way to get this look when I'm at (URL) and click on "Technic" group. I am (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | David Arnon <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> wrote in message news:GAs7xK.Mus@lugnet.com... (...) appear (...) and (...) _and_ (...) post (...) group (...) I'm (...) choice is (...) Unfortunately, the whole newsgroup system (not just Lugnet's (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —David Arnon
|
| | | | | | (...) Are you saying that when I wanted some info on the LEGO stores in Manhattan I should have posted to: lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny.man, lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny, lugnet.loc.us.ny, lugnet.loc.us ? I'm not an expert on the posting rules... What will be the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | (...) Mabie what needs to happen is that lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny.man and possibly lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny even should disappear altogether. The whole loc heriachy needs a rethink IMHO. (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Harvey Henkelman
|
| | | | | (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Aaron West
|
| | | | | (...) retail, unless TLC combines it with Robotics. I don't want any Robotics with Tech, because I only want the Technic parts (or sets that ARE good parts) that I can combine in interesting ways with the rest of the Classic/System, etc LEGO. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Another way of looking at it is that what you once knew as "LEGO TECHNIC" is no longer "LEGO TECHNIC." IOW, what Technic is has changed. :-) (...) --Todd (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic —Tom Heverly
|
| | | | (...) I sure hope technic will change back. I just got addicted ... ahem, re-introduced to lego at about the first of the year. I took a class in college that has the dacta RCX kit. Within a week of seeing a cheesy demonstration bot bounce off a (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| | | | |
