Subject:
|
Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:39:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
771 times
|
| |
| |
It comes under Technic, all of the Parts are Technic, other than the mask
and weapon
--
Michael
- - -
Please reply on
medwards@ukonline.co.uk
Lugnet Member# 151
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lego Magazines from the Past and Present
www.lugmag.com or www.lugmag.co.uk
Home of the UK Lego Technic Club Magazine
www.technic-uk.co.uk
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Dean Hystad" <dean.hystad@mts.com> wrote in message
news:GAM79x.EL5@lugnet.com...
> Am I the only person who is annoyed by all the Bionicle posts that appear
> under technic? RoboRiders, Throbots, and Znap were never much of a problem
> because nobody ever posted anything about them. Or if they did, it was
> about a neat and useful part contained in a kit, or how it could be
> integrated with technic.
>
> In my not so humble opinion, bionicle is more of a theme toy like Castle, or
> Aquazone, or (gasp) Belville. Maybe a new category could be created for
> toys like bionicle, throbots, and roboriders. Toys which seem to have more
> appeal as a collectable than as a building set. I even have a suggestion
> for the name: http://news.lugnet.com/garbage.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Bionicle is not Technic
|
| Am I the only person who is annoyed by all the Bionicle posts that appear under technic? RoboRiders, Throbots, and Znap were never much of a problem because nobody ever posted anything about them. Or if they did, it was about a neat and useful part (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.general) !
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|