Subject:
|
Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:19:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
649 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.general, Dean Hystad writes:
> Am I the only person who is annoyed by all the Bionicle posts that appear
> under technic? RoboRiders, Throbots, and Znap were never much of a problem
> because nobody ever posted anything about them. Or if they did, it was
> about a neat and useful part contained in a kit, or how it could be
> integrated with technic.
>
> In my not so humble opinion, bionicle is more of a theme toy like Castle, or
> Aquazone, or (gasp) Belville. Maybe a new category could be created for
> toys like bionicle, throbots, and roboriders. Toys which seem to have more
> appeal as a collectable than as a building set. I even have a suggestion
> for the name: http://news.lugnet.com/garbage.
I second this one...-Harvey
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Bionicle is not Technic
|
| Am I the only person who is annoyed by all the Bionicle posts that appear under technic? RoboRiders, Throbots, and Znap were never much of a problem because nobody ever posted anything about them. Or if they did, it was about a neat and useful part (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.general) !
|
15 Messages in This Thread: ![Bionicle is not Technic -Dean Hystad (22-Mar-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -Michael Edwards (22-Mar-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -Ronald Vallenduuk (22-Mar-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -Ross Crawford (22-Mar-01 to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -David Arnon (26-Mar-01 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -Todd Lehman (26-Mar-01 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -David Arnon (26-Mar-01 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -Ron Sedlmeyer (26-Mar-01 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -Ross Crawford (26-Mar-01 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -David Arnon (26-Mar-01 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -Jonathan Wilson (26-Mar-01 to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.nntp)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -Aaron West (23-Mar-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -Todd Lehman (25-Mar-01 to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic.bionicle)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Bionicle is not Technic -Tom Heverly (25-Mar-01 to lugnet.technic.bionicle)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|