| |
In lugnet.general, Dean Hystad writes:
> Am I the only person who is annoyed by all the Bionicle posts that appear
> under technic? RoboRiders, Throbots, and Znap were never much of a problem
> because nobody ever posted anything about them. Or if they did, it was
> about a neat and useful part contained in a kit, or how it could be
> integrated with technic.
Another way of looking at it is that what you once knew as "LEGO TECHNIC" is
no longer "LEGO TECHNIC." IOW, what Technic is has changed. :-)
> In my not so humble opinion, bionicle is more of a theme toy like Castle, or
> Aquazone, or (gasp) Belville. Maybe a new category could be created for
> toys like bionicle, throbots, and roboriders. Toys which seem to have more
> appeal as a collectable than as a building set. I even have a suggestion
> for the name: http://news.lugnet.com/garbage.
Check out lugnet.technic.bionicle and siblings...
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
| (...) I sure hope technic will change back. I just got addicted ... ahem, re-introduced to lego at about the first of the year. I took a class in college that has the dacta RCX kit. Within a week of seeing a cheesy demonstration bot bounce off a (...) (23 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Bionicle is not Technic
|
| Am I the only person who is annoyed by all the Bionicle posts that appear under technic? RoboRiders, Throbots, and Znap were never much of a problem because nobody ever posted anything about them. Or if they did, it was about a neat and useful part (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.general) !
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
