 | | Re: LUGNET Spotted in LEGO Mania Magazine - Thread?
|
|
(...) the (...) Scott, I won't be long winded about this but could you please drop this issue. Todd made a change to the home page to try and settle your grievance. I personally don't consider this an issue and frankly no one else has come out to (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Spotted in LEGO Mania Magazine - Thread?
|
|
(...) Eric You have answered none of the points I raised - none. I am a free thinking and open minded kind of person. I respect your right to have an opinion, if I thought you were ever wrong about an issue I'd given a reasoned argument against it. (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Spotted in LEGO Mania Magazine - Thread?
|
|
(...) Eric, Sorry for responding to your message twice. But your line above, when I read it the second time, reminded me of this exchange: (URL) quoting, I am not saying a agree with it 100% :-) Scott A (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Spotted in LEGO Mania Magazine - Thread?
|
|
(...) Scott, First, I thought I did address your issue but quoting the LEGO Lawyers statement that the donation by Brad Justus DID NOT consititute endorsement or sponsorship of LUGNET. If that doesn't answer your question I am sorry but I am at a (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Spotted in LEGO Mania Magazine - Thread?
|
|
(...) I (...) OK. Now define "sponsored" & "endorsed" Could these two words be misunderstood by anyone? Scott A (...) expected (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Spotted in LEGO Mania Magazine - Thread?
|
|
(...) I disagree vehemently - issues should be worked out on the validity of arguments, not as a popularity contest. Also - beating down an opposing point of view based upon an interpretation of "popular opinion" (something which isn't determinable (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Spotted in LEGO Mania Magazine - Thread?
|
|
(...) Go check the lugnet.com main page. It specifically states that the gift is not believed to be a sponsorship or endorsement "in a legal sense". The normal definitions of the words do not matter here - the legal definitions under US law (since (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Spotted in LEGO Mania Magazine - Thread?
|
|
(...) BTW, I just changed that passage from "...which is not believed to constitute sponsorship or endorsement..." to "...which does not imply sponsorship or endorsement..." (i.e., to remove the "not believed to" portion). When two top LEGO Systems, (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Spotted in LEGO Mania Magazine - Thread?
|
|
(...) Words are words, their meaning is their meaning. Legal statements do not, as far as I am aware, use any abnormal definitions - they are simply clear and unambiguous (unless they are intended to be otherwise). Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Spotted in LEGO Mania Magazine - Thread?
|
|
(...) Uh, sure, Scott. What's a bonnet? Or a boot? Depends on if we're talking about clothing or cars. Words can often have very different meanings in different contexts. (...) Legal definitions are often much more precise than they are when used by (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
