To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 12740
12739  |  12741
Subject: 
Re: Amount spent - LEGO code update (Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?_
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 27 Dec 1999 22:48:36 GMT
Viewed: 
904 times
  
In lugnet.general, James Brown writes:


Relevant to point out that Mark, not Wayne, is the one who wanted to attach a
dollar value to an opinion.

I chose to use Wayne's response as a launching point
for my reply because, while defending himself against
an attack, he wound up inadvertantly validating the
concept of the attack, which was (paraphrased) "go away and
come back when you've spent tens of thousands of
dollars."

My goal was primily (1) to be silly -- and only secondarily
(2) to use a bit of satire to see if I could derail that
particular train of argument, and I hope that neither Mark
nor Wayne took a personal affront to the post.

--

jthompson@esker.com   "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily"



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Amount spent - LEGO code update (Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?_
 
(...) Relevant to point out that Mark, not Wayne, is the one who wanted to attach a dollar value to an opinion. James (URL) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)

21 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR